 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Other Stuff » Sports Talk » I hate the freaking Red Sox
Duff77
I hate the Red Sox.
I hate the freaking Red Sox
October 17, 2008 at 08:36AM View BBCode
They can go to hell, seriously. Okay, fine--you come back from seven runs down, now you'll come back from down 3-1, sweep the Phillies, and FOX can have it's October David Ortiz orgasm. Whoop-de-freakin'-do.I hate the Red Sox.
happy
I hope.
well, assuming every single game has a 50% chance of each team winning, there is a 62.5% chance that a terrible team wins the world series this year.
October 17, 2008 at 09:07AM View BBCode
TB is just milking the series for extra home games.I hope.
well, assuming every single game has a 50% chance of each team winning, there is a 62.5% chance that a terrible team wins the world series this year.
Duff77
October 17, 2008 at 09:12AM View BBCode
There you go again. You need to qualify the term "terrible." The Orioles are "terrible." The Nationals are "terrible." Actually, the Nationals are diaper-rash terrible. None of the four playoff teams are terrible, although some are better on paper than others. It's too bad they don't play the games on paper, too, because they might not last five hours if they did. New rule proposal: Three fouls and you're out. I know, I'm a purist.
Duff77
Also, a pitcher who enters a game must either allow two walks or hits or allow a run before being removed.
Purist, I know.
October 17, 2008 at 09:26AM View BBCode
Originally posted by Duff77
New rule proposal: Three fouls and you're out.
Also, a pitcher who enters a game must either allow two walks or hits or allow a run before being removed.
Purist, I know.
dirtdevil
October 17, 2008 at 12:54PM View BBCode
it's the red sox in the LCS. this is what they do.
tm4559
Purist, I know.
from your mouth to God's ears.
October 17, 2008 at 01:43PM View BBCode
Originally posted by Duff77
New rule proposal: Three fouls and you're out.
Purist, I know.
from your mouth to God's ears.
folifan19
I think you've read one too many Ironhorse posts.
Down with the Red Sox!
Oh, I think you should add, any team down 7-0 going into the 7th inning should roll over and die, to your list.
October 17, 2008 at 02:16PM View BBCode
Originally posted by Duff77
There you go again. You need to qualify the term "terrible." The Orioles are "terrible." The Nationals are "terrible." Actually, the Nationals are diaper-rash terrible. None of the four playoff teams are terrible, although some are better on paper than others. It's too bad they don't play the games on paper, too, because they might not last five hours if they did. New rule proposal: Three fouls and you're out. I know, I'm a purist.
I think you've read one too many Ironhorse posts.
Down with the Red Sox!
Oh, I think you should add, any team down 7-0 going into the 7th inning should roll over and die, to your list.
ironhorse2ko
[quote][i]Originally posted by Duff77[/i]
There you go again. You need to qualify the term "terrible." The Orioles are "terrible." The Nationals are "terrible." Actually, the Nationals are diaper-rash terrible. None of the four playoff teams are terrible, although some are better on paper than others. It's too bad they don't play the games on paper, too, because they might not last five hours if they did. New rule proposal: Three fouls and you're out. I know, I'm a purist. [/quote]
I think you've read one too many Ironhorse posts.
Down with the Red Sox!
Oh, I think you should add, any team down 7-0 going into the 7th inning should roll over and die, to your list. [/quote]
Yea, I don't think I would go that far back, but still a good idea. Down with the BoSox!
[Edited on 10-17-2008 by ironhorse2ko]
October 17, 2008 at 06:58PM View formatted
You are viewing the raw post code; this allows you to copy a message with BBCode formatting intact.
[quote][i]Originally posted by folifan19[/i]
[quote][i]Originally posted by Duff77[/i]
There you go again. You need to qualify the term "terrible." The Orioles are "terrible." The Nationals are "terrible." Actually, the Nationals are diaper-rash terrible. None of the four playoff teams are terrible, although some are better on paper than others. It's too bad they don't play the games on paper, too, because they might not last five hours if they did. New rule proposal: Three fouls and you're out. I know, I'm a purist. [/quote]
I think you've read one too many Ironhorse posts.
Down with the Red Sox!
Oh, I think you should add, any team down 7-0 going into the 7th inning should roll over and die, to your list. [/quote]
Yea, I don't think I would go that far back, but still a good idea. Down with the BoSox!
[Edited on 10-17-2008 by ironhorse2ko]
happy
By terrible, i mean teams who make my heart sink.
October 18, 2008 at 05:41PM View BBCode
Originally posted by Duff77
There you go again. You need to qualify the term "terrible." The Orioles are "terrible." The Nationals are "terrible." Actually, the Nationals are diaper-rash terrible. None of the four playoff teams are terrible, although some are better on paper than others. It's too bad they don't play the games on paper, too, because they might not last five hours if they did. New rule proposal: Three fouls and you're out. I know, I'm a purist.
By terrible, i mean teams who make my heart sink.
Pages: 1