May 21, 2009 at 02:22PM View BBCode
Which team (depending on how repentant he will be for past actions) will likely pick him up and what postion he will play?May 21, 2009 at 02:27PM View BBCode
why would michael vick play any position other than quarterback?May 21, 2009 at 02:33PM View BBCode
Because other teams many not be all that willing to replace their starter w/ Vick. Also, he has potential as a rusher; Minnesota would be a good place for him as a QB though.May 21, 2009 at 02:43PM View BBCode
because most backup quaterbacks with that much obvious running skill would be considered for other positions. Kick returner, wideout, dime back, some bastardized backfield...May 21, 2009 at 04:38PM View BBCode
they guy was an all-pro quarterback and has no experience playing any other position. why on earth would anyone want to train him somewhere else at this point of his career. the idea is ridiculous.May 21, 2009 at 05:04PM View BBCode
Yeah Deke, I think you're wrong on this one. I think there is at least a chance that a team will want to sign him to fill a more flexible role.May 21, 2009 at 05:18PM View BBCode
the idea of some team taking him and doing some option stuff i find interesting. it would be fun to watch.May 21, 2009 at 06:17PM View BBCode
saying vick is a pro bowl QB is a misleading statement of fact.May 21, 2009 at 06:26PM View BBCode
Originally posted by happy
saying vick is a pro bowl QB is a misleading statement of fact.
May 21, 2009 at 06:27PM View BBCode
Originally posted by happy
saying vick is a pro bowl QB is a misleading statement of fact.
May 21, 2009 at 06:30PM View BBCode
All-pro (which is what Deke said) is a lot different from Pro Bowl. Vick went to some Pro Bowls, but he was never an All-Pro.May 21, 2009 at 06:30PM View BBCode
Originally posted by folifan19
He said WAS a pro bowl QB, not is. Not that it matters...
May 21, 2009 at 06:32PM View BBCode
Originally posted by happy
saying vick is a pro bowl QB is a misleading statement of fact.
May 21, 2009 at 06:34PM View BBCode
It's possible. Deke was definitely wrong about the all-pro thing (and it's not a trivial distinction - there are like 6 Pro Bowl QB's every season, plus alternates, but All-Pro recognizes one 1st-team guy and one 2nd team guy and that's pretty much it.)May 21, 2009 at 06:35PM View BBCode
Originally posted by happy
saying vick is a pro bowl QB is a misleading statement of fact.
May 21, 2009 at 06:36PM View BBCode
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
All-pro (which is what Deke said) is a lot different from Pro Bowl. Vick went to some Pro Bowls, but he was never an All-Pro.
May 21, 2009 at 06:38PM View BBCode
but you didn't say he was a pro-bowl QB. i am misled actually. i am just not sure who by. what we need is ME. he could tell us, quite flatly and finally, whether Vick ever was, at any point in his career, great, decent or sucked. and then we wouldn't need these pesky speculations.May 21, 2009 at 06:40PM View BBCode
Originally posted by dirtdevil
if he has anywhere near the skills he left with, he's probably a better qb than what about roughly a quarter of the league has in place right now.
May 21, 2009 at 06:47PM View formatted
May 21, 2009 at 06:47PM View BBCode
it is a huge if, which is why he's not going to get a big money deal. the thing with vick though, is that if there's any part of his game that's deteriorated, it's as likely to be his legs as anything. which pretty much kills his value anywhere other than qb. he always had a bad rap as a pocket passer, but it's not like he was ever playing with randy moss, either.May 21, 2009 at 07:02PM View BBCode
(If his legs have deteriorated, then he's censored . At that point, all of this becomes academic.)May 21, 2009 at 07:23PM View BBCode
did staubach's legs deteriorate to the point of unusability while he was in the navy?May 21, 2009 at 07:39PM View BBCode
Has anyone suggested that he shouldn't be allowed to attempt to make a comeback in the NFL?