April 27, 2010 at 03:44PM View BBCode
Is there anyway ABE can take the best player in the minors to auto-promote instead of 17/18 yr olds?April 27, 2010 at 04:51PM View BBCode
The reason that ABE takes the younger players first has to do with option years and stuff. I agree that it would be nice for auto-promote to look for best available guys first, rather than puching up the youngest people.April 27, 2010 at 05:20PM View formatted
April 27, 2010 at 09:16PM View BBCode
if we were to make the default for ABE to promote the most-skilled overall player in the minors who has options remaining, would that suffice? and is that terribly difficult to code?April 28, 2010 at 04:22AM View BBCode
I always hope the 17 yr old gets hurt right away, then another, then another.April 29, 2010 at 11:33PM View BBCode
Could it be an option that the owner can weight option years vs. talent for auto-promote (the default being 50/50)?April 30, 2010 at 12:07AM View BBCode
i don't see why we'd bother. any owner active enough to set that pref would presumably not get hit with the autopromote anyway.April 30, 2010 at 08:00PM View BBCode
or you could have the league basically vote him out due to inactivity, right?May 06, 2010 at 03:30AM View BBCode
Technically, as long as the guy checks in according to the site standards, you can't legally. I had one guy who would check in every 14 days. Did this over a two month period (four plus seasons for us). I would have liked to have forced him out but couldn't.Pages: 1