 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Sim Forums » Subscription League Vacancies and Information » Quick Commentary of private league rules and future development
tysonlowery
In the coming weeks, I will lay out the next batch of changes and what our goals are for the next few months in terms of changes. Some things that I would like to address include:
An Initial draft that is similar to the new Amateur Draft, Talent Inflation, Anti-Tanking measures, incentives for playing veterans, a trade deadline built into the game, a Waiver system that some players have to pass through before they can be demoted, an official Injured Reserve instead of just demoting guys, changes to the OffSeason improvement system so that players don't end up clones of one another (ie all A- accross all skills), balancing power/contact and control/velocity, a more robust system for determining retirements, the age shift idea for more random player development, things to make managing multiple teams less time consuming (setting backups, getting emails when guys are no longer injured, and having trade emails provide a link directly to the trade), pinch runners, and more realistic game play in terms of running the bases.
That's probably enough stuff to take a year to do, but we will begin working on some of these items in May and throughout the summer.
Quick Commentary of private league rules and future development
May 07, 2004 at 05:58PM View BBCode
Just wanted to put this out there. One of the things that has been helpful with private leagues coming up with their own rules is that it helps illustrate areas that need addressed and what is most important to people. For example, in the HAL they had a series of rules to address how easy it was to convert a RP to a SP and take advantage of that, we have hopefully fixed that issue. Another one I can think of off the top of my head is that when I noticed more and more leagues doing live drafts, I decided it was time to get a new draft system in place. Also, draft pick trading comes to mind.In the coming weeks, I will lay out the next batch of changes and what our goals are for the next few months in terms of changes. Some things that I would like to address include:
An Initial draft that is similar to the new Amateur Draft, Talent Inflation, Anti-Tanking measures, incentives for playing veterans, a trade deadline built into the game, a Waiver system that some players have to pass through before they can be demoted, an official Injured Reserve instead of just demoting guys, changes to the OffSeason improvement system so that players don't end up clones of one another (ie all A- accross all skills), balancing power/contact and control/velocity, a more robust system for determining retirements, the age shift idea for more random player development, things to make managing multiple teams less time consuming (setting backups, getting emails when guys are no longer injured, and having trade emails provide a link directly to the trade), pinch runners, and more realistic game play in terms of running the bases.
That's probably enough stuff to take a year to do, but we will begin working on some of these items in May and throughout the summer.
Meathead44
May 07, 2004 at 06:06PM View BBCode
Um...................wow............................cool.
Bob
[Edited on 5-7-2004 by Bob]
May 07, 2004 at 06:26PM View BBCode
That's a mighty big list and will require a lot of work, but those changes will improve an already excellent game. I would like to add one thing to the list -- defense. Right now defensive ratings don't impact the number of plays made by a player, they only impact errors he makes. It would be nice if defense played a more prominent and realistic role. Also, it would make sense to address out of position penalties at the same time. Just my 2 cents.[Edited on 5-7-2004 by Bob]
jrspc4
I second both those thoughts.
Tyson the site is great, the proposed changes are awesome, and range should have impact on whether balls fall in for hits.
Jeff
May 07, 2004 at 06:33PM View BBCode
Bob & MattI second both those thoughts.
Tyson the site is great, the proposed changes are awesome, and range should have impact on whether balls fall in for hits.
Jeff
skierdude44
May 07, 2004 at 07:04PM View BBCode
Wow sounds great. This site will be AWESOME when all that is implemented. Im sure by then though we will have a new batch of things to whine and complain about;). Great job Tyson.
res98
May 07, 2004 at 08:06PM View BBCode
Wonderful Ideas...contrary to some opinions, I do love this game and this site....I just get passionate about things when I feel an injustice has taken place.
celamantia
This actually is not as true as it sounds. Unfortunately, the current system gives us no feedback on how a play might have turned out differently; failed double plays, for example, show up as simple force outs. I sent some code to Tyson to expose some of this information, but I don't think he wants to look at in until this round of changes is in the bag.
--Chris
May 07, 2004 at 11:39PM View BBCode
Originally posted by Bob
That's a mighty big list and will require a lot of work, but those changes will improve an already excellent game. I would like to add one thing to the list -- defense. Right now defensive ratings don't impact the number of plays made by a player, they only impact errors he makes.
This actually is not as true as it sounds. Unfortunately, the current system gives us no feedback on how a play might have turned out differently; failed double plays, for example, show up as simple force outs. I sent some code to Tyson to expose some of this information, but I don't think he wants to look at in until this round of changes is in the bag.
--Chris
chekwsl
I pretty generally agree that those are the issues facing SD. I am so appreciative to be involved with a businessman who listens to his customers.
My ranking of most important items:
1) Anti-tanking measures, including trying to lose all season long just to gain improvements and picks.
2) Less predictability in improvements. (Age-Shift?)
3) The anti-cloning measures which include a more realistic balance between contact/power and velocity/control.
4) Added value for vets.
5) Play of the game things like pinch runners, advancing on flyballs, etc.
6) Other things mentioned + getting the earned run/unearned run thing right.
It's a great product and the dedication of many under Tyson's leadership is making it better.
Thanks.
4)
My nickel's worth.
May 13, 2004 at 01:13PM View BBCode
Originally posted by tysonlowery
Just wanted to put this out there. One of the things that has been helpful with private leagues coming up with their own rules is that it helps illustrate areas that need addressed and what is most important to people. For example, in the HAL they had a series of rules to address how easy it was to convert a RP to a SP and take advantage of that, we have hopefully fixed that issue. Another one I can think of off the top of my head is that when I noticed more and more leagues doing live drafts, I decided it was time to get a new draft system in place. Also, draft pick trading comes to mind.
In the coming weeks, I will lay out the next batch of changes and what our goals are for the next few months in terms of changes. Some things that I would like to address include:
An Initial draft that is similar to the new Amateur Draft, Talent Inflation, Anti-Tanking measures, incentives for playing veterans, a trade deadline built into the game, a Waiver system that some players have to pass through before they can be demoted, an official Injured Reserve instead of just demoting guys, changes to the OffSeason improvement system so that players don't end up clones of one another (ie all A- accross all skills), balancing power/contact and control/velocity, a more robust system for determining retirements, the age shift idea for more random player development, things to make managing multiple teams less time consuming (setting backups, getting emails when guys are no longer injured, and having trade emails provide a link directly to the trade), pinch runners, and more realistic game play in terms of running the bases.
That's probably enough stuff to take a year to do, but we will begin working on some of these items in May and throughout the summer.
I pretty generally agree that those are the issues facing SD. I am so appreciative to be involved with a businessman who listens to his customers.
My ranking of most important items:
1) Anti-tanking measures, including trying to lose all season long just to gain improvements and picks.
2) Less predictability in improvements. (Age-Shift?)
3) The anti-cloning measures which include a more realistic balance between contact/power and velocity/control.
4) Added value for vets.
5) Play of the game things like pinch runners, advancing on flyballs, etc.
6) Other things mentioned + getting the earned run/unearned run thing right.
It's a great product and the dedication of many under Tyson's leadership is making it better.
Thanks.
4)
res98
Thanks for all you do for us!!!!;)
May 13, 2004 at 06:47PM View BBCode
If you can implement even 1/2 of those ideas..It 'll make things alot more balanced....and take some of the "system" outta playThanks for all you do for us!!!!;)
sycophantman
Great stuff though! Rock on Tyson!
May 14, 2004 at 09:56PM View BBCode
I wonder if a word from Jack will 86 these changes...:rolleyes:Great stuff though! Rock on Tyson!
RockNJock25
May 14, 2004 at 10:14PM View formatted
You are viewing the raw post code; this allows you to copy a message with BBCode formatting intact.
That's harsh...funny...but harsh. :lol:
Jack1
Jack1
You've earn two attaboys T-Low.:cool::cool2:
Well for all you harsh and funny remarks!!!
May 18, 2004 at 10:10PM View BBCode
I agree these would be exemplary changes to this great game. Lets play ball.Jack1
You've earn two attaboys T-Low.:cool::cool2:
HollywoodOz
Might I suggest (or re-suggest) that a morale value for each player that drops when a team loses, or when a player is benched or demoted, which eventually leads to that player wanting a trade, will limit both tanking and the non-playing of veterans, while also giving the transfer market and the value of older players a real boost.
That'd be my pick for the first development, but that list promises to keep this place at the top of the list of sports sims in the world today.
May 21, 2004 at 06:43PM View BBCode
Good deal.Might I suggest (or re-suggest) that a morale value for each player that drops when a team loses, or when a player is benched or demoted, which eventually leads to that player wanting a trade, will limit both tanking and the non-playing of veterans, while also giving the transfer market and the value of older players a real boost.
That'd be my pick for the first development, but that list promises to keep this place at the top of the list of sports sims in the world today.
ChillyWilly
May 22, 2004 at 08:44PM View BBCode
Tyson your doing amazing. I can't wait for all of those things to implemented. Wow im getting excited just sitting here.Pages: 1