July 02, 2004 at 06:40PM View BBCode
What is the most efficient way to use the death penalty???July 02, 2004 at 06:41PM View BBCode
i give this less than 24 hours till it gets shut down, far too controversial of subject, but i think th best way is lethal injection, pretty quick and painlessJuly 02, 2004 at 06:50PM View BBCode
guillotine:lol: that would be awesome... but i highly doubt it. and your probably right arod, it shouldnt be too long:DJuly 02, 2004 at 06:59PM View BBCode
I still say the guillotine is the most efficient. It's quick. It's inexpensive. Plus it's re-usable.July 02, 2004 at 07:19PM View BBCode
ok, so i finally come up with something "meaningful" to talk about and its probably going to be closed... what a shame...July 02, 2004 at 07:25PM View BBCode
How expensive if Cyanide? How would you distrubite it? Think of the costs. The question was which way was the most 'efficient.'July 02, 2004 at 07:26PM View BBCode
i say we put them all in a little cell on an island in canada and when we get a mill or so we just take a big ol plane and drop an a-bomb on them.July 02, 2004 at 07:30PM View BBCode
put all the bad people in a cell. get a million people or so. bomb the shit outta them.July 02, 2004 at 07:31PM View BBCode
criminals. murderers. rapists. drug lords. purple people eaters. real sick stuff.July 02, 2004 at 08:55PM View BBCode
criminals
July 03, 2004 at 12:44AM View BBCode
Efficient? Firing squad, clearly. Bullets are cheap and every prison has a bunch of gaurds who can shoot straight enough to kill a guy. Do it on a tarp to keep the mess all in one place, and then just roll it up and toss it in the ground. That's as efficent as it gets. They've already got the guns and ammo, and one cheapo tarp per execution can't possibly cost that much.July 03, 2004 at 12:54AM View BBCode
actually wouldn't suffacation be more efficient than a fire squad? All you would need is to a table with straps to hold the prisoner in place and a cheap $2 pillow. A guard could do it so you wouldn't even need to pay extra labor, or if they wanted to pay extra labor they could just hire a person to do all of it.July 03, 2004 at 06:04PM View formatted
July 04, 2004 at 05:32AM View BBCode
no, there is a more efficient way than any of those. one that will MAKE money. BRING BACK GLADIATORS!!!!! you see, sure 1 horrible murderer in every 40 or 50 or so would just be released. in fact, the most horrible of the horrible will be released. teh guy who could kill everyone else, BUT it would make money. SELL TICKETS!!!! man, that would rule. Dont know if any of you have heard my awesome gladiator theory. Basically the only penalty is either fines or death. Sometimes you get points. like 300 points for rape, and if you get to 500, you have to go into the gladiator fight. Man would that rule. not only would i buy tickets, i would buy SEASON TICKETS!!!!July 04, 2004 at 01:22PM View BBCode
Yes, the Romans had a great idea with gladiators. You know they were originally introduced as a way of lower crime. The emperor(i forget who it was that built the collusium) had a theory that giving the public an entertaining blood bath would keep their animalistic behaviors to a minimum. Research has since shown that it worked, though they're not sure if that was the reason why or if it was just fear of becoming the next person to fight to the death.Pages: 1 2