 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Sim Forums » Baseball Enhancements » "all you can eat, baby"
Jughead
a) I have to check every team at least once every three days unless I notify the league ahead of time
b) I have to field a complete lineup and keep my minors at a pre-determined level (probably 20, except for System 4, where the requirement to have below 25 is self-policing, in that you can't set a lineup if you have more than 50 on your roster)
c) Dynasty not included
Try it for a one-year trial period to clean up the list of available teams, and then reassess. Call it a Black Friday special. What the hell, why not.
"all you can eat, baby"
November 18, 2013 at 12:05AM View BBCode
Charge me $50/month or $399/year and let me have as many leagues as I want. Here are the stipulations:a) I have to check every team at least once every three days unless I notify the league ahead of time
b) I have to field a complete lineup and keep my minors at a pre-determined level (probably 20, except for System 4, where the requirement to have below 25 is self-policing, in that you can't set a lineup if you have more than 50 on your roster)
c) Dynasty not included
Try it for a one-year trial period to clean up the list of available teams, and then reassess. Call it a Black Friday special. What the hell, why not.
Admin
I'd include the dynasty leagues as well, I don't see a reason to exclude them - do you?
I'd like to get an idea of how many people (and who) might be interested in such an idea. If you'd be interested in such a plan at $70 per month, please reply below and I'll consider the suggestion.
Thanks!
December 03, 2013 at 11:11PM View formatted
You are viewing the raw post code; this allows you to copy a message with BBCode formatting intact.
It is an intriguing idea. We'd need to charge a bit more than $50/month, maybe $70/month. It would be some work to automate this.
I'd include the dynasty leagues as well, I don't see a reason to exclude them - do you?
I'd like to get an idea of how many people (and who) might be interested in such an idea. If you'd be interested in such a plan at $70 per month, please reply below and I'll consider the suggestion.
Thanks!
Jughead
But if people wanted to do Dynasty Leagues, I don't know why it would be a bad thing :) I'm wondering if the leonards and kittenses of the world would be interested, although THOSE GMs you're already making more than that. It's more to get the buzzzes and heinerkins to play (and spend) more :)
For me, I already spend about that month, so it doesn't make much of a difference. But in any case, we need to see that others would be interested first, as you've said.
December 04, 2013 at 09:45PM View BBCode
I was primarily thinking of a way to clear out the privateavailable.jsp page. It would only take three or four memberships to do it. Would reduce the need to find chaperones as well. Combined with game updates, maybe after 12-18 months this wouldn't be necessary anymore, but just an interim solution.But if people wanted to do Dynasty Leagues, I don't know why it would be a bad thing :) I'm wondering if the leonards and kittenses of the world would be interested, although THOSE GMs you're already making more than that. It's more to get the buzzzes and heinerkins to play (and spend) more :)
For me, I already spend about that month, so it doesn't make much of a difference. But in any case, we need to see that others would be interested first, as you've said.
Admin
I put up a poll for some owners to see how many would be interested, I've gotten 4 positive responses. The rest either not interested, or maybe later. I'm going to continue to think about this, and some other ideas that have been sparked by this idea.
Tyson
December 05, 2013 at 09:11PM View BBCode
I don't know how helpful this would be in the long term. Because what happens when one of the "all you can eat" people decides to cancel? Then you're back with dozens of teams on the list.I put up a poll for some owners to see how many would be interested, I've gotten 4 positive responses. The rest either not interested, or maybe later. I'm going to continue to think about this, and some other ideas that have been sparked by this idea.
Tyson
Jughead
Yes, if one of those members cancels you're back where you started, but if we do nothing we're there already. The goal is not so more leagues can be created but to reduce the list of available teams. Ideally this option goes away once the list is pared down to a reasonable size.
But an option to avoid this would be to offer an annual version.
December 09, 2013 at 09:54PM View BBCode
Well, I'm glad a) it's not just me, and b) it could lead to some tangible result.Yes, if one of those members cancels you're back where you started, but if we do nothing we're there already. The goal is not so more leagues can be created but to reduce the list of available teams. Ideally this option goes away once the list is pared down to a reasonable size.
But an option to avoid this would be to offer an annual version.
Pages: 1