April 07, 2003 at 01:34PM View BBCode
In the first game of the 1953 season in the Jackie Robinson league, Mike Johnson of the Cleveland Warriors threw a no-hitter ([url=http://www.simdynasty.com/boxscore.jsp?boxscoreid=157653&cityid=3]game link[/url]), now that's a nice way to start the year!April 08, 2003 at 01:52AM View BBCode
thats impossible. he musta pitched against a real bad hitting team because rarely does a pitcher have his stuff at the beginning of the season. Ever more rarer is lasting longer then 7 innings even if they're pitching good. However it is the fifties in this game so ill give you that.April 08, 2003 at 02:39AM View BBCode
Hey brainiac, the link is right there. Let the rest of us know when you clue in to the fact that this is a simulation (and an imperfect one). Impossible? Kent Mercker threw a no-hitter April 8, 1994 against the Dodgers. On April 7, 1979 Ken Forsch threw a no-hitter against the Braves. Hideo Nomo threw a no-hitter April 4, 2001 against Baltimore. You try to come off as someone who knows something about baseball, but clearly you don't know much. Why don't you go troll elsewhere?April 08, 2003 at 03:18AM View BBCode
The point of my post was that throwing a no-hitter on opening day must've come against a crappy team. The 2001 Baltimore!! HAHA! You call that a hitting team! How did they finish??? You know how many pitchers lower they're ERA when they play the devil rays??? I bet you could get a no-hitter versus then on ANY day.April 08, 2003 at 04:13PM View BBCode
Wrong again! The team that was no-hit is in the top-half of the league in offensive production. Congratulations, you've advanced to the bonus round of Ultima007 makes a fool of himself! What's going to be the topic?April 08, 2003 at 04:44PM View BBCode
WOW they'r in the top half of offensive production and its not even half way into the season! they're INCREDIBLE! Man Kansas city royals are one of the best hitting teams right now, does that mean they'll be the best come september??? think before you talk/type.April 08, 2003 at 08:40PM View formatted
April 08, 2003 at 08:43PM View BBCode
not true. Ill admire something that is worth talking about.April 08, 2003 at 09:16PM View BBCode
Good point Doug. S/He is much too much for me to handle. And, as engaging as his/her commentary and banter are, his/her logic is just too overwhelming. Perhaps Tyson will allow him/her to be moderator of the "Check this Out" section, as clearly the rest of us are incapable of figuring out what is worthy of being "Checked Out" and what isn't.April 08, 2003 at 09:31PM View BBCode
Thanks DougB and DCoombs for speaking up when 'ultima0061/2 is being rude and condescending. Been carrying the ball almost by myself for last 2-3 weeks.April 08, 2003 at 09:39PM View BBCode
last 2-3 weeks eh? more like 2-3 days. Dont overexaggerate things to make me look worse dudeApril 08, 2003 at 10:01PM View BBCode
last 2-3 weeks eh? more like 2-3 days. Dont overexaggerate things to make me look worse dude
April 08, 2003 at 10:17PM View BBCode
Yah rehab that was 2 weeks ago. Mark3 said "the last 2-3 weeks" which means hes been defnding himself every day for 2-3 weeks. One post 2 weeks ago does not account for THE WHOLE 2 WEEKS. Unless that post affected him self so much that he couldn't go into the world anymore but im not that mean. So therefore marks wrong also cuz he said 2-3 weeks when it was actually 2 weeks. Anyone else wanna try one?? celamantia tryed and failed.April 08, 2003 at 10:33PM View BBCode
I doubt if any of us waste much time or keystrokes trying to make you look bad.April 09, 2003 at 01:32AM View BBCode
Yah rehab that was 2 weeks ago. Mark3 said "the last 2-3 weeks" which means hes been defnding himself every day for 2-3 weeks. One post 2 weeks ago does not account for THE WHOLE 2 WEEKS.
April 09, 2003 at 01:38AM View BBCode
EVERYONE COMBINED?? dont be so generous. What do you call negative comments towards me rehab? For each negative comment ive made theres about 5 against me so therefore thats way more then ALL of my posts combined. You wanna try again because you aint doing that good?Pages: 1