Sim Dynasty

View Old Forum Thread

Old Forum Index » Other Stuff » Sports Talk » Vikiing v. Eagles
ABDREW

Vikiing v. Eagles

January 13, 2005 at 02:47AM View BBCode

Where are all the Minnesota and Philly fans? This looks like its going to be a great game this weekend w/o TO playing. Where are all the diehard fans of these teams? Eagle fans usually talk more smack than Yankee fans.


I personally think the men in purple are going to take it but its goign to be tough in Philadelphia.
ME

January 13, 2005 at 04:19AM View BBCode

They are either afraid, or don't play Sim Dynasty.
alphabetagaga

January 13, 2005 at 05:09AM View BBCode

E-A-G-L-E-S!

What does that spell?

Iggles!

I doubt they lose. Brian Westbrook is healthy, and Philly should be able to control the ball long enough to keep Randy "Moon" and Culpepper off the field.
ME

January 13, 2005 at 05:25AM View BBCode

Wow! You can spell two-syllable words! Well, that's better than J-E-T-S fans...
alphabetagaga

January 13, 2005 at 07:20AM View BBCode

Plus, our stadium doesn't smell like piss anymore!

...I mean, in the few weeks that the janitors have had to clean it up.

Ah, Philly.
ABDREW

January 13, 2005 at 11:32AM View BBCode

This is bordering on an off-topic thread right now. Lets' get it back to the game.
skierdude44

January 13, 2005 at 12:03PM View BBCode

I like the Eagles in this game but I think that Minnesota will give them a good game. With Owens out McNabb will revert back to the way he played in years past. He will look at his primary read and if there is nothing there he will take off. There should also be more passes to the tight ends and backs. His completion % will probably be around 55-57% whcih is about what it was before Owens' arrival in Philly. The key to the game is Brian Westbrook. He is a good receiving threat and a speedy runner. Minnesota's linebacking corps don't have a lot of speed and make poor decisions which may force Minnesota to bring up a safety and have him double Westbrook. Also Moss is not 100% healthy and Philly's secondary has three starting Pro Bowlers and one of the best defenses in the league. It is one thing to light it up against the Packers' D which is about as resistant as a wet paper bag, but it is another to light up a top defense.
DeVeau31

January 13, 2005 at 02:28PM View BBCode

I like the Vikings in this spot for two reasons:

1. No TO.
2. Eagles' regulars haven't played in a month.

Not sure if they can win in Philly, especially with a hurt Randy Moss, but it should be a very good game, low scoring I believe. Well, low for these two teams, under 50 points.
ABDREW

January 13, 2005 at 03:03PM View BBCode

2 very good points Tom. And also 2 of the reasons I like MInn. I also think that Moss is going to have a field day against Phills DBs'
DeVeau31

January 13, 2005 at 03:07PM View BBCode

sure, IF he can run.
alphabetagaga

January 13, 2005 at 04:30PM View BBCode

Hey, Eagles haven't played their regulars in a game for a month, but they're still practicing. Not playing in the game may have an effect on the first series or two of the game, but as the offense comes p to full speed, I feel the Philly defense will be able to negate the Vikings enough for the first couple plays of the game.

The Vikings are too inconsistent to ever be a serious pick.
abarkov

January 13, 2005 at 05:40PM View BBCode

No TO - strike 1
No Deuce Staley - strike 2
Andy Reed still the Head coach - strike 3
Plus the fact that the regulars haven't played in about a month makes this a very winnable game for MInnesote and I take them by 3.
Brownbeard

January 13, 2005 at 07:21PM View BBCode

Minnesota 30
Philly 24

and both quaterbacks runs for 100+ yards to lead their team.
Bengals

January 13, 2005 at 07:44PM View BBCode

Keep in mid that:
1. The starters haven't played, but they still practice- It's not like they just sit there. They will also obviously be more rested than Minnesota.
2.The starters are pissed because the backups lost to the Bengals. They want to rip someone's head off, and that will make it tough for the Vikings.
However, I did wearsome inflatable viking horns this afternoon.

[Edited on 1-13-2005 by Bengals]
sfgiants4

January 13, 2005 at 08:30PM View BBCode

abarkov if andy reid is a strike against the Eagles then my favorite but not so great coach mike tice counts as a strike for viks.

I llive near philly but i dont like the eagles, all my friends do though and they usually bragg a lot about the eagles, this week though they haven't been braging is that because they are afraid they are gonna lose maybe so, its gonna be a close game, i say the vikings get an early lead and lose it in the 4th quarter but win the game on the last drive. My prediction Viks-24 Birds-21
prvev

January 13, 2005 at 08:48PM View BBCode

I think Philly will win, McNabb will play well even without TO, and they will get the ball to Westbrook every way imaginable. Should be a good game.
Smocko

January 14, 2005 at 01:49AM View BBCode

Get off the Vikings bandwagon everybody.

Eagles by 17.
Revenant

January 14, 2005 at 02:50AM View formatted

You are viewing the raw post code; this allows you to copy a message with BBCode formatting intact.
Yeah smock, I agree it's a waltz for the Eagles this week. I also agree that no TO and Reid's play calling are a stumbling block, but the Vikings are a mess, and the Birds' personnel even sans TO is top notch. It takes a complete team like the Steelers or Pats who can run with authority and control possession and clock, on top of strength in every other phase of the game, to make Philly sweat. Minnesota doesn't match up well against them at all. Nor does Atlanta or St. Louis this year.

Eagles should finally make the big game, only to be set down by the AFC champ. Unless the Jets make it somehow, then maybe the Birds can go all the way. It's true Eagles fans are scared - I live in Philly, and they are conditioned here to expect post-season disaster, and now with no TO that's all they can think about. But the players themselves are primed and ready, and if they can tune out the media panic, they'll remember that nobody in the NFC can beat them.

PS Jets are a longshot, but it's not unprecedented for an AFC underdog to get hot in the playoffs, and then get blown out in the Big Bowl. I wouldn't be too surprised to see an all-green Super Sunday.

[Edited on 1-14-2005 by Revenant]
skierdude44

January 16, 2005 at 07:03PM View BBCode

21-7 Philly so far after an LJ Smith fumble shoots foward into the hands of Freddie Mitchell for a Eagle's touchdown. That was amazing:o
abarkov

January 16, 2005 at 07:15PM View BBCode

Yeah so far Philly is getting all the breaks. Lokks like a lot of people including myself will have some crow to eat after this one.
skierdude44

January 16, 2005 at 07:25PM View BBCode

Minnesota is a very streaky team. The looked great against Green Bay but all that means nothing the next week. It is always a gamble to bet on them because they can either make you look like a genious or a moron.
abarkov

January 16, 2005 at 07:26PM View BBCode

I'll have you know I don't need Minnesota's help to look like a moron.;)
abarkov

January 16, 2005 at 08:02PM View BBCode

Nuts Philly interception and leading by 14. Looks like real trouble for Minnesota.
whiskybear

January 16, 2005 at 08:17PM View BBCode

Who knew the best No. 84 on the field would be Freddie Mitchell?
drunkengoat

January 16, 2005 at 08:20PM View BBCode

Surely you jest in the idea that Randy Moose could EVER be the best #84 on ANY NFL field of play.

Pages: 1 2