April 14, 2005 at 10:58PM View BBCode
I just don't understand this guy. After coming off of an amazing and heroic Super Bowl performance which helped him gain some respect he pulls his latest stunt. He believes that he "out performed" his contract and deserves more money. He believes that the contract is not suited for a premiere player which he believe he is (and there is no doubt there atleast). But come on man, YOU SIGNED THE DAMN THING. If you aren't happy with the terms you have no one to blame but yourself. I really wonder if he realizes these sort of things. If you sign a contract it means you agree to the terms. The same goes for his big free agency debacle last offseason where he and his agent missed the deadline to turn in the papers granting him free agency. Apparently paperwork isn't his strong suit.April 14, 2005 at 11:17PM View formatted
April 14, 2005 at 11:27PM View BBCode
I heard that he wants more money pushed to the front end of his 7 yr 49 mill contract as opposed to the back end.April 14, 2005 at 11:31PM View BBCode
He said today that he feels that the current deal is not "fit" for a player of his stature. It's been all over ESPN and I was reading an article on MSN about it earlier. I'll take a look and see if I can find the link.April 14, 2005 at 11:41PM View BBCode
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/3541152April 15, 2005 at 12:10AM View BBCode
Hmm, it's rather sad...April 15, 2005 at 12:52AM View BBCode
The one thing that I respect about T.O. is that he will give you 110% on the field at all times. Whether he is happy or not he never dogs it like Randy Moss does. He actually won me over and got me in his corner with his Super Bowl performance but that's all over with now and I'm back to disliking him. On the field he constantly gives effort but sometimes you have to wonder if the off the field headaches he causes are worth it.April 15, 2005 at 01:11AM View BBCode
Jeff Garcia wasn't totally worthless. He was one of the league's better QBs for several years.April 15, 2005 at 02:54AM View BBCode
Not to condone TO's behavior, because he is seemingly the biggest malcontent in professional sports, but he does have a point about the non-guaranteed contracts. Teams in the NFL can cut a player any time they want and not be on the hook for his remaining yearly salary, so why shouldn't the players turn the tables on the owners and squeeze every nickel they can from them while their team is willing to pay them real actual money (as opposed to the paper fortunes that they give out to guys with backloaded contracts who won't see a dime of the money they sign for in the last few years of the deal)?April 15, 2005 at 12:16PM View BBCode
Well, it's hard to be too sympathetic, since normal citizens of planet reality live by those employment standards their entire lives...April 15, 2005 at 06:59PM View BBCode
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
Not to condone TO's behavior, because he is seemingly the biggest malcontent in professional sports, but he does have a point about the non-guaranteed contracts. Teams in the NFL can cut a player any time they want and not be on the hook for his remaining yearly salary, so why shouldn't the players turn the tables on the owners and squeeze every nickel they can from them while their team is willing to pay them real actual money (as opposed to the paper fortunes that they give out to guys with backloaded contracts who won't see a dime of the money they sign for in the last few years of the deal)?
April 15, 2005 at 08:02PM View BBCode
I'm not sympathetic to TO, not one bit. He is a malcontent and a petulant child and he should shut his damn yap for a little bit. I'm just saying, don't judge him by the same standard that you might judge a baseball player, or a basketball player, who sign a mutual contract and who are guaranteed that money. He won't see a dime on the back end if he gets cut, so I at least understand it when a football player holds out or asks for more money despite already signing a contract.Pages: 1