 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Other Stuff » Off Topic » World Series
andrew
I'll say it for you. The Yankees suck, and are down 1-0 in the Division Series already.
LOL
Anyways I am going to go with... hmm, the Braves to go all the way. I really don't care this season, though.
September 30, 2003 at 09:53PM View BBCode
u kno wut im gonna say so i wont even say it.
I'll say it for you. The Yankees suck, and are down 1-0 in the Division Series already.
LOL
Anyways I am going to go with... hmm, the Braves to go all the way. I really don't care this season, though.
skierdude44
September 30, 2003 at 10:23PM View formatted
You are viewing the raw post code; this allows you to copy a message with BBCode formatting intact.
down 0-1 means nothing in the alds. anaheim wuz down 0-1 last year and the yankees were down 0-1 in '96. a team has been down 0-1 many times and still came back to win in the alds. nlds is different only 2 teams have come back to win after being down 0-1.
Cubsfan13
September 30, 2003 at 11:34PM View BBCode
Im loving the pitching match ups in the first round, really looking forward to Wood-Ortiz tonight. Beckett-Schmidt today was great. Im not going to predict a champion yet (I know I did earlier but it was so early it didn't have too much jinxing significance).
happy
September 30, 2003 at 11:41PM View BBCode
well, world series, although i think this is one of the weakest Yankees teams for a while, i think the only team truly better than them are the redsox. ALCS Yankees Redsox, NLCS Braves Giants, WS Redsox Giants, winner Giants. Im not sure weather the giants or the braves get to beat the redsox, although i think the curse may end soon. what year was the last year they won the WS? 1917...1921...i cant remember, well anyway although i think their team is REALLY good this year, i think they may win it on the 100th anniversary of their last WS win.
farfetched
And there's talk of Barry Bonds being the greatest ever? Pfff....
October 01, 2003 at 04:39AM View BBCode
1918... Babe Ruth was still a pitcher and he STILL managed to lead the league in homers.And there's talk of Barry Bonds being the greatest ever? Pfff....
Duff77
Greatest player ever? Personally, I'd like to see Barry take a pee test before we determine that.
October 01, 2003 at 04:51AM View BBCode
BTW...it got proven again today...it's no bargin to walk Barry Bonds. They walked him today in the eighth--with 2-out--and it still cost them a run. Barry's all kinds of trouble no matter what you do with him.Greatest player ever? Personally, I'd like to see Barry take a pee test before we determine that.
BravesLuver
up Twins
Up Braves
Up Braves,
October 01, 2003 at 02:56PM View BBCode
Up Twins. Up A's. Up Braves. Up Giantsup Twins
Up Braves
Up Braves,
ME
NL:
Frisco 3
Fish 0
Cubs 3
Braves 2
Frisco 4
Cubs 1
AL:
yankees 3
twins 2
amazing a's 3
red sox 0
yankees 4
amazing a's 3
World Series:
Frisco 4
Yankees 1
October 01, 2003 at 03:21PM View BBCode
here's the whole listNL:
Frisco 3
Fish 0
Cubs 3
Braves 2
Frisco 4
Cubs 1
AL:
yankees 3
twins 2
amazing a's 3
red sox 0
yankees 4
amazing a's 3
World Series:
Frisco 4
Yankees 1
happy
October 01, 2003 at 06:57PM View BBCode
well, i dont need any pee test to see what he is doing on the field. Bonds is no way better than Ruth even if you take out ruth's pitching
1tim412
(Ok, so call me biased, but still, you gotta admit Oakland has been pretty impressive so far)
October 03, 2003 at 05:44AM View BBCode
It'll be A's over BoSox in 3 or 4. Yankees over Twins in 5. SF over FLA in 4. Atl over Chi in 5. A's over Yankees in 5. Atl over SF in 7. A's over Atl in 6.(Ok, so call me biased, but still, you gotta admit Oakland has been pretty impressive so far)
Duff77
October 03, 2003 at 06:16AM View BBCode
You know, I saw screw predictions. None of us know who's going to win. Let's just enjoy the games. It's a great time of year.
happy
October 04, 2003 at 10:02PM View BBCode
well so much for ME's guess. i think i said yankees Vs either Braves or san fran, but higher chance of san fran. Looks like both my NL predictions are gonna drop out, but i dont see how ANYONE with SUCH A DUMB BEARD could win any games. it looks like he has an afro on his chin. (im talking about the Cubs pitcher Clement)
skierdude44
October 05, 2003 at 01:27AM View BBCode
now ur discriminating against ppl with facial hair happy. mayb i should take offense to that since i have a mustache and my dad has a beard. i have no idea wut facial hair does to ur pitching ability. but u seem to happy.
1tim412
October 05, 2003 at 05:46AM View BBCode
All I have to say is that ever since Ted Lilly and Barry Zito started growing their beards, they have been lights out (minus Lilly's tune-up which he didn't care about)
happy
October 06, 2003 at 07:50PM View BBCode
YOU HAVE A MUSTACHE??? thats funny, i couldnt see it. well anyway, i think your belief that i have a hatred towards all people with facial hare is funny too. I only hate people with afros on their chin
skierdude44
October 07, 2003 at 12:31AM View BBCode
and y do u hate ppl with afros on their chins happy? wut have they ever done to u? see irrational hate happy the main characteristic of a person that discriminates.
ME
GOOD FACIAL HAIR
skierdude you prove you don't understand. he said that clement looks stupid cause of his beard, not that everyone with facial hair is bad.
October 07, 2003 at 03:16PM View BBCode
STUPID FACIAL HAIR
GOOD FACIAL HAIR
skierdude you prove you don't understand. he said that clement looks stupid cause of his beard, not that everyone with facial hair is bad.
happy
October 07, 2003 at 07:09PM View BBCode
thank you me. I tried to put pics in my discussion board things, and it never worked. i think it was a confederate flag since skier thinks im a racist, and probably thinks the confederate flag is symbolic of racism (it isnt)
skierdude44
October 07, 2003 at 07:17PM View BBCode
i think ur racist happy bcuz u r. whether u want to admit it or not racial profiling is racist. anyway the facial hair thing wuz a joke and i dont think of john smoltz as an example of good facial hair. his is no worse than clements.
happy
whatever, yeah im a racist because you are a mind reader, and you can take some not racist stuff off this post, and decide what i think.
although i dont believe that i am a racist, i guess i will have to join the Klan, becuase you think i am, so you have convinced me.
October 08, 2003 at 06:14PM View BBCode
yeah, i kinda guessed thatwhatever, yeah im a racist because you are a mind reader, and you can take some not racist stuff off this post, and decide what i think.
although i dont believe that i am a racist, i guess i will have to join the Klan, becuase you think i am, so you have convinced me.
skierdude44
and btw if u wanna see an example of good facial hair look at the picture to the left of this post.
October 08, 2003 at 08:29PM View BBCode
if u define not racist as discriminating against people than u r right but if u use the widely excepted sane definition than u r wrong. i can tell wut u think by ur posts bcuz all normal ppl post wut they r thinking about a certain topic on the messages boards therefor u can tell wut someone thinks about a certain topic. for example, i think that the yankees will win the world series. u can tell that that is wut i think bcuz i said it. i kno that wut i said b4 is assuming that u r somewhat normal which is a big risk that i am taking but i'll go out on a limb anyway.and btw if u wanna see an example of good facial hair look at the picture to the left of this post.
Pages: 1 2