 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Baseball League Forums » Speed Leagues » Wally Berger League » Montreal Trade Offers
ballmark
July 14, 2015 at 03:32AM View BBCode
Being new here, I am open to receiving offers from Montreal. We'll see how full the ol' Inbox gets.
Michael1
July 14, 2015 at 12:22PM View BBCode
I'll accept them but reserve the right to decline without saying why.
mmm6862
I'll accept them but reserve the right to decline without saying why.
July 18, 2015 at 06:11PM View BBCode
I agree with the followingI'll accept them but reserve the right to decline without saying why.
metsman456
September 11, 2015 at 07:50PM View BBCode
I'll accept trade offers from anyone but will decline any I don't want. Hope that makes sense.
ambush
Willing to deal!!!
With this team.....
March 13, 2016 at 03:32PM View BBCode
I am "trader inspired"!!Willing to deal!!!
ambush has attached this image:
ambush
Must not be getting it! What's new???
No Problems Here!
March 30, 2016 at 06:18PM View BBCode
We are in control of our team's decisions... can't blame anyone else for an offer that didn't work out....Must not be getting it! What's new???
ambush has attached this image:
metsman456
accept some of the offers is beyond me. Especially some of the recent ones with NY. Maybe the NY owner is related to him.
March 30, 2016 at 10:07PM View BBCode
I'll take the offers. Of course I'll decline the unfair ones. How some ownersaccept some of the offers is beyond me. Especially some of the recent ones with NY. Maybe the NY owner is related to him.
bahstonwedsawks
Nope, not related. No dynasty dollars given. No seasons given...nor any other tin hat conspiracy theory you dream up.
Some deals are declined, some are accepted. Some receive protests, some don't. Ultimately, we live in a democracy in the USA and SimD is no different. People vote and that is the law of the land. Vote however you want. If you think something is unfair go ahead and vote against it. If you think a trade is fair vote for it. Either way, certainly don't whine about it.
March 31, 2016 at 01:26AM View BBCode
Originally posted by pecker247
Ambush in order to maintain a competitive balance in this league it's not in the best interest of this league to allow new owners to the league to get "ambushed"
Bahston has already destroyed the competitive balance of this league and you have made it worse. I don't know what personal gains that you got out of the deal whether it be money or dynasty dollars, paid seasons or what, but the trades that you have made contradict your rebuilding process. You aren't trying to get fair value out of your players at all which is obvious by this last trade. Giving away your two first round picks which will more than likely be the first overall pick does not allow you to rebuild your team.
It's unfortunate that Bahston has taken advantage of you, but it's not you that I am worried about it's the integrity of this league. I fear that this league will soon be disbanded and it will be because of one owner and one owner alone. It's a shame that an owner would go to great lengths to make sure that he wins at a fake baseball game, but some people will do anything to get ahead in anything that they do. In fact Bahston reminds me of the picture that you posted.
Nope, not related. No dynasty dollars given. No seasons given...nor any other tin hat conspiracy theory you dream up.
Some deals are declined, some are accepted. Some receive protests, some don't. Ultimately, we live in a democracy in the USA and SimD is no different. People vote and that is the law of the land. Vote however you want. If you think something is unfair go ahead and vote against it. If you think a trade is fair vote for it. Either way, certainly don't whine about it.
Maze
It is amazing why an owner would deliberately snake an incoming owner harassing them constantly on bogus deals. For the first six months - REAL SIX MONTHS - I was harassed constantly by Montreal saying no to every single deal. Only a few deals came by that made sense which got me to over-stand his theory of mass submitting of trade offers that made no sense ... like the last couple of deals NY Knickers accepted. It's more like destroying a franchise knowing u won't be back in a couple of seasons - so an incoming owner will have a super rough time bringing it back to prosperity.
SO many owners have left due to the harassing BOGUS offers/deal drama - why something hasn't been said before is amazing. Owners would rather leave to another league than worry about trade-deal drama. In the five seasons since arriving, I believe five owners have left due to these measures.
As a competitor, the OGs carry a strong will to roll with the flow.
However, this is me assessment of the major problems in the WBL which has been stated in other posts. I sent the NY Knickers and other new owners a message warning the bogus-deal offers they'll receive from Montreal, some have taken heed, but the NY Knickers took the sucker ball and keeps swallowing it loving the bogus juice.
Disbanding the league won't deter the same thing from reoccurring. The rule should be if a vote gets overturn, the trade partners would be unable to make deals with each other for 90 game days. They would still be able to make deals other owners (if they're qualified - ones that have not been overturned), but not with the overturned-owner for 90 game days.
Whether the league stays intact - the OGs will know when it's time to depart. Perhaps after the 2027 season ... maybe will stay longer - but if the OGs leave, we'll leave Sim D for good because the trust of anything being done about a nuisance will be lost.
Leaving Sim D shall depend on those dreaded painful motion ads and the trade-deal drama inside the WBL.
Maze
March 31, 2016 at 03:12AM View BBCode
Any wise owner would not give up so much that NY Knickers have given up. If u do feel like these were solid re-building deals, u are way off and it's very obvious u are in the wrong league ... not a vision in sight on these trades NY has accepted.It is amazing why an owner would deliberately snake an incoming owner harassing them constantly on bogus deals. For the first six months - REAL SIX MONTHS - I was harassed constantly by Montreal saying no to every single deal. Only a few deals came by that made sense which got me to over-stand his theory of mass submitting of trade offers that made no sense ... like the last couple of deals NY Knickers accepted. It's more like destroying a franchise knowing u won't be back in a couple of seasons - so an incoming owner will have a super rough time bringing it back to prosperity.
SO many owners have left due to the harassing BOGUS offers/deal drama - why something hasn't been said before is amazing. Owners would rather leave to another league than worry about trade-deal drama. In the five seasons since arriving, I believe five owners have left due to these measures.
As a competitor, the OGs carry a strong will to roll with the flow.
However, this is me assessment of the major problems in the WBL which has been stated in other posts. I sent the NY Knickers and other new owners a message warning the bogus-deal offers they'll receive from Montreal, some have taken heed, but the NY Knickers took the sucker ball and keeps swallowing it loving the bogus juice.
Disbanding the league won't deter the same thing from reoccurring. The rule should be if a vote gets overturn, the trade partners would be unable to make deals with each other for 90 game days. They would still be able to make deals other owners (if they're qualified - ones that have not been overturned), but not with the overturned-owner for 90 game days.
Whether the league stays intact - the OGs will know when it's time to depart. Perhaps after the 2027 season ... maybe will stay longer - but if the OGs leave, we'll leave Sim D for good because the trust of anything being done about a nuisance will be lost.
Leaving Sim D shall depend on those dreaded painful motion ads and the trade-deal drama inside the WBL.
Maze
Admin
I'm considering something of this nature. I wouldn't want a single overturned trade to trigger it, but if there is a pattern of issues between a pair of owners, then a restriction seems reasonable.
Chris
April 01, 2016 at 09:06PM View BBCode
Originally posted by Maze
The rule should be if a vote gets overturn, the trade partners would be unable to make deals with each other for 90 game days. They would still be able to make deals other owners (if they're qualified - ones that have not been overturned), but not with the overturned-owner for 90 game days.
I'm considering something of this nature. I wouldn't want a single overturned trade to trigger it, but if there is a pattern of issues between a pair of owners, then a restriction seems reasonable.
Chris
bahstonwedsawks
I know it's not up to me, but I'd be in favor of that rule.
April 01, 2016 at 09:37PM View BBCode
Originally posted by Admin
Originally posted by Maze
The rule should be if a vote gets overturn, the trade partners would be unable to make deals with each other for 90 game days. They would still be able to make deals other owners (if they're qualified - ones that have not been overturned), but not with the overturned-owner for 90 game days.
I'm considering something of this nature. I wouldn't want a single overturned trade to trigger it, but if there is a pattern of issues between a pair of owners, then a restriction seems reasonable.
Chris
I know it's not up to me, but I'd be in favor of that rule.
sparxx
May 14, 2016 at 04:50PM View BBCode
Just catching up... As I am the new Detroit owner I will (already have accepted a trade with Montreal.) He also knows that I'm not interested in anything further until I get some idea ass to the strength of my team.
pittstlrs
February 01, 2017 at 06:15PM View BBCode
Seattle and the new ownership are open to receiving offers from the Montreal team.
pittstlrs
Thanks,
Bill - Seattle Baseball Furies
May 02, 2017 at 02:24PM View BBCode
After getting numerous offers over the past couple of seasons, Seattle will no longer like to receive offers from Montreal. Please take Seattle off of the accepting offers list.Thanks,
Bill - Seattle Baseball Furies
mmm6862
May 03, 2017 at 02:31PM View BBCode
I'll accept trade offers. But reserve the right to decline without comment