 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Other Stuff » Sports Talk » Colts-Steelers
indychris3
January 17, 2006 at 06:18PM View BBCode
I saw this all coming, i got so mad i ripped my shirt in half. this was susposed to be their year. the play calling was Terriable!! not only the entire game but the final drive. They had 2 and 2 with 30 second to go and 3 time outs. if they ran the ball with james into the middle of the field it would have set up a better field goal. No way they needed to keep going for the deep ball. They were very lucky that the interception was reversed but that False start Pitt had that they didnt call killed the colts losing 4 mins of the game with 10 min left. Isint it sad when the colts play their worse game of the season and still only lose by 3?
whiskybear
Easy there, Bruce Bannon.
January 17, 2006 at 06:34PM View BBCode
Originally posted by indychris3
i got so mad i ripped my shirt in half.
Easy there, Bruce Bannon.
rkinslow19
Welcome to my world Indy. At least you don't have to have a steelers avatar
January 17, 2006 at 06:47PM View BBCode
Originally posted by indychris3
Isint it sad when the colts play their worse game of the season and still only lose by 3?
Welcome to my world Indy. At least you don't have to have a steelers avatar
drew
Certainly. More often than not the players with the better numbers are truly the better players. But...
I guess I don't give most people as much credit as you do. Maybe I'm wrong in that regard. [url=http://www.larrythecableguy.com/]But who knows?[/url]
Everyone always forgets about ability to throw a kettle over a pub!
(Yes, that is about the 5th time I have used that joke.)
Solid argument on sample size by the way. I don't know if I agree, but it has me thinking.
[Edited on 1-17-2006 by drew]
January 17, 2006 at 07:12PM View BBCode
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
You don't have to throw them out entirely simply because they're imperfect.
Certainly. More often than not the players with the better numbers are truly the better players. But...
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
I think most people have an intuitive feel for how much weight to put in those numbers and how much they are distorted by outside factors.
I guess I don't give most people as much credit as you do. Maybe I'm wrong in that regard. [url=http://www.larrythecableguy.com/]But who knows?[/url]
Originally posted by whiskybear
Drew relies on details such as "heart" and "kung-fu grip" when analyzing football players.
Everyone always forgets about ability to throw a kettle over a pub!
(Yes, that is about the 5th time I have used that joke.)
Solid argument on sample size by the way. I don't know if I agree, but it has me thinking.
[Edited on 1-17-2006 by drew]
whiskybear
Eh, close enough. The Hulk is just a cheap Popeye knock-off, anyway.
January 17, 2006 at 07:22PM View BBCode
Originally posted by max_fischer
Bruce Banner.
Eh, close enough. The Hulk is just a cheap Popeye knock-off, anyway.
whiskybear
It is a fine, reliable joke.
January 17, 2006 at 08:15PM View BBCode
Originally posted by drew
Everyone always forgets about ability to throw a kettle over a pub!
(Yes, that is about the 5th time I have used that joke.)
It is a fine, reliable joke.
FuriousGiorge
January 17, 2006 at 08:17PM View BBCode
And imminently relatable to all of...3(?) people.