 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Baseball League Forums » Dynasty Leagues » Jimmy Wynn League » scmidt up for grabs....
natehoyt83
as for my veterans everyone is available for a 4 rnd pick. if you are looking to improve your bench or have a week of these players are all good.
nate
scmidt up for grabs....
October 23, 2003 at 08:30PM View BBCode
i would like to trade mike scmidt. one of my top players for a number one draft pick. anyone here who needs a good young thirdbaseman here is your chance. if you get him, and even if he sits the bench hes gotten alot of abs on my roster so he is going to get alot of improvement chances. good pwr, range, speed, and arm. a very good player. i would also like to trade parrish for 2 and 5 or a 3-4 picks. another young player with alot of big league abs this season. if you want a decent young pitcher with alot of opportunity to improve i will trade millwood for a 1 pick. in my minors i will trade polanco for a 2 rnd pick. make offers. ive already done the developing for you. im giving away prospects for draft picks. i am also looking for a b- or better cf i will trade any of the above.as for my veterans everyone is available for a 4 rnd pick. if you are looking to improve your bench or have a week of these players are all good.
nate
Crusader
Made Inquiry Trade Offer
October 23, 2003 at 11:21PM View BBCode
Nate, check your trade desk.
Papaherbs1
I was wondering if you have so few minor leaguers because you planned to concentrate your inprovements on just those players you wanted to develop? When you drop below 15 minor leaguers you begin to lose opportunities at the end of games. This for you is I guess a double edged sword. On the one hand you are losing opportunities because of having less than 15 players in your minors. On the other hand you are making sure that the only players who get any chances are the ones you really want to develop.
So did you mean to do this?
Dominateors minor leagues question
October 24, 2003 at 01:22AM View BBCode
Nate,I was wondering if you have so few minor leaguers because you planned to concentrate your inprovements on just those players you wanted to develop? When you drop below 15 minor leaguers you begin to lose opportunities at the end of games. This for you is I guess a double edged sword. On the one hand you are losing opportunities because of having less than 15 players in your minors. On the other hand you are making sure that the only players who get any chances are the ones you really want to develop.
So did you mean to do this?
DaRoosta
You don't have to answer because it might be some super-secret something or other. I was in a fraternity, so I can keep a secret. LOL
Jeremy
Kind of off subject
October 24, 2003 at 02:14AM View BBCode
I don't understand something. I can't get my minor league roster below 15. I understand the reason for the 15 limit, but you only have 6 guys in the minors, Nate. How does that happen? I have a bunch of scrubs who are basically using up CP's because I can't get rid of them.You don't have to answer because it might be some super-secret something or other. I was in a fraternity, so I can keep a secret. LOL
Jeremy
postal99
DaRoosta
October 24, 2003 at 03:39AM View BBCode
to get below 15 players in your minor league you have to waive players during a trade.
DaRoosta
Do ya'll think it's an advantage to have fewer than 15 on your minor league roster, or do you think it's the opposite?
I see
October 24, 2003 at 02:11PM View BBCode
Thanks for the heads-up.Do ya'll think it's an advantage to have fewer than 15 on your minor league roster, or do you think it's the opposite?
natehoyt83
so in a way i meant to do it, but its not really working out, but i would much rather have it this way than have a bunch of 30 somethings getting improvement chances but not getting any improvements.
nate
under 15...
October 24, 2003 at 08:08PM View BBCode
i thought it might be an advantage when i did it, but i do not really think it is anymore. the only reason i am keeping it that way is because adding garbage from the waiver wire will do exactly what the roosta said his problem is.so in a way i meant to do it, but its not really working out, but i would much rather have it this way than have a bunch of 30 somethings getting improvement chances but not getting any improvements.
nate
natehoyt83
but i am most interested in a young cf or more pitching. if you can not offer that i am looking for 1 and 2 type draft picks. duncan, schmidt, millwood, maurer any one could be had for a number one pick. daulton and kruk would probably take more than a number one pick, and everyone else is available for a number 2. or 3 and 4. all of my players in the big leagues have been given alot of ab so they will be do for some big improvements in the off season. even millwood who is my best pitcher and the only one i will part with without being overwelmed will have 200 ip, and i wont let him go over that. according to the rulebook all of these players should get alot of improvement chances.close to 100 a piece. they are all young. schmidt and millwood are both in the 24-26 age range that is supposed to allow for the greatest chance of improvemnet. i am willing to trade these players that i have developed for the chance at more promising players. so make offers, and realize that these opportunities do not last. when schmidt is a b or b+ 3b my price will be going up or i may be content to keep my prized 3b prospect in the minors untill hes 24 or 25. same with millwood. hes already got an a velocity so if he improves his control due to his massive amount of improvement chances he could go from a struggling pitcher on a bad team to the ace of a great staff. so make offers im practicly giving these guys away.
my roster....
October 29, 2003 at 06:31PM View BBCode
i have a roster filled with prospects, and that does not mean that i am unwilling to trade them. my pitching i probably would not be willing to trade, but my better offensive players are all available. schmidt in particular.but i am most interested in a young cf or more pitching. if you can not offer that i am looking for 1 and 2 type draft picks. duncan, schmidt, millwood, maurer any one could be had for a number one pick. daulton and kruk would probably take more than a number one pick, and everyone else is available for a number 2. or 3 and 4. all of my players in the big leagues have been given alot of ab so they will be do for some big improvements in the off season. even millwood who is my best pitcher and the only one i will part with without being overwelmed will have 200 ip, and i wont let him go over that. according to the rulebook all of these players should get alot of improvement chances.close to 100 a piece. they are all young. schmidt and millwood are both in the 24-26 age range that is supposed to allow for the greatest chance of improvemnet. i am willing to trade these players that i have developed for the chance at more promising players. so make offers, and realize that these opportunities do not last. when schmidt is a b or b+ 3b my price will be going up or i may be content to keep my prized 3b prospect in the minors untill hes 24 or 25. same with millwood. hes already got an a velocity so if he improves his control due to his massive amount of improvement chances he could go from a struggling pitcher on a bad team to the ace of a great staff. so make offers im practicly giving these guys away.
Keth
October 29, 2003 at 09:49PM View BBCode
Nate, might want to recheck that math. lol. To get a 100 improvement chances a position player would need 1000 Plate apperances, a SP 380 IP and a RP 160 IP. The # of chances is 1 for each 10 PA, SP is 1 for every 3.8 IP, and RP 1 for every 1.6 IP. In addition, unless I am mistaken, a RP only gets chances up to 100 IP. After 100 IP he gets 1 chance for each 10 IP for Endurance only. Also, pitching younger SP over 200 IP or RP over 100 IP will reduce their health. Would hate to see you counting on almost 100 imrovement chances on all those young guys when that is just not happening. 50-60 is about right for a fulltime position player. 200 IP = 52 chances for a SP and 100 IP = 62 chances for a RP. Good luck though. All those young guys will certainly improve with playing time though. - NY:)
natehoyt83
nate
good math keth
October 29, 2003 at 10:22PM View BBCode
i said about 100 i guess 60 is much closer your right. i was gettting excited. my work was canceled today, and i was filing my time with simdynasty without having much interesting stuff to do at this point. anyway i knew about the 200 and 100 thing and am being very careful. i have a 22 yr old rp with 98 ip im going to get him the 2 more and than im sending him dwn. my starters are all on pace for the 200 ip and will be sent down or to the bull pen as they get closer. my point in that post is that the c+ and b- players on my team are not only young but inline for big time improvements that other teams might not realize. unfortunately i think that the chances of winning with all of my players developing at the same time may not be realistic. if i spread it out over the next few years i may be able to establish a dynasty. by bringing up good young players and trading my 28 yr old stars.nate
Pages: 1