 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Other Stuff » Sports Talk » Anyone else think...
Duff77
Anyone else think...
April 12, 2009 at 02:23AM View BBCode
...baseball-reference.com's redesign completely sucks? Because I do.
Cubsfan13
April 12, 2009 at 02:55AM View BBCode
It looks the same as basketball-reference now. So...I guess I'm used to that, and therefore I don't mind it.
farfetched
Something to keep in mind for SD player cards in the future.
April 12, 2009 at 08:16PM View BBCode
I like the new feature of drag-and-drop over a certain period on the player card to get partial career stats.Something to keep in mind for SD player cards in the future.
Jughead
The new setup makes me think it's shifted to a higher gear. More potential, but not necessarily better at what it already could do. They need to do a better job of saying what this upgrade enables (or will enable). Or maybe I need to pay more attention. I didn't see anything about it though.
April 12, 2009 at 08:39PM View BBCode
I use it for my fantasy baseball notes on my Web site (meaning I link to the players on that site). I was shocked that Jordan Schafer (sp) did not have a card after his ML debut. I had to link to <gag> CBS Sportsline.The new setup makes me think it's shifted to a higher gear. More potential, but not necessarily better at what it already could do. They need to do a better job of saying what this upgrade enables (or will enable). Or maybe I need to pay more attention. I didn't see anything about it though.
Duff77
April 12, 2009 at 09:45PM View BBCode
What ticked me off more than anything was that you could go forward or backward in year on practically any team page. It doesn't seem to work anymore. Either that or I'm dumb and haven't figure it out yet. Also, the type is too freaking small. That's probably fixable?
FuriousGiorge
Yes.
April 12, 2009 at 11:35PM View BBCode
Originally posted by Duff77
What ticked me off more than anything was that you could go forward or backward in year on practically any team page. It doesn't seem to work anymore. Either that or I'm dumb and haven't figure it out yet.
Yes.
Duff77
April 13, 2009 at 03:11AM View BBCode
Oh, okay I am stupid. I have to admit it does look a little more professional this way.
FuriousGiorge
April 13, 2009 at 03:32AM View BBCode
(I'm glad you figured it out. It's kind of right where it used to be.)
Duff77
Truthiness.
April 13, 2009 at 03:36AM View BBCode
That's not possible. If it was I would have seen it right away.Truthiness.
happy
April 13, 2009 at 06:15AM View BBCode
this is the worst subject heading of all time. 12 year olds do this. half a sentence, the unimportant half, to pique your curiosity and cause you to click it, because you cant ever remember what its about. just call it "baseball-reference redesign", whats wrong with that? You do this every time. Buttery fail.
bobcat73
[Edited on 4-14-2009 by bobcat73]
April 14, 2009 at 04:27AM View BBCode
I was thinking it would be a juicy subject and sadly I found this. What a let down.[Edited on 4-14-2009 by bobcat73]
Jughead
April 14, 2009 at 05:47PM View BBCode
One could say the Orioles are being teases right now as well.
shep1582
I prefer the old look.
But Jimmy Wynn is sponsored by SimD, so I'm delighted.
April 15, 2009 at 10:45PM View BBCode
to answer your question, it looks similar to basketball-ref.com now, and I never liked that site's look.I prefer the old look.
But Jimmy Wynn is sponsored by SimD, so I'm delighted.
Pages: 1