 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Other Stuff » Sports Talk » schmidt v arod
shep1582
michael jack could have been a good ML SS. most people scoffed at Weaver when he made Ripken a SS. I think he could have been comparable in the field to Cal.
arod could have been beloved. he's smarmy, though, so lots of people hate him. He's a great player, though.
who's better? given a time machine, and you can draft them, who would you take in an amateur draft, assuming they are both 18, and a general knowledge they will both turn out to be who they actually became.
talk amongst yourselves.
schmidt v arod
February 12, 2010 at 09:50PM View BBCode
for bart, acus I love him.michael jack could have been a good ML SS. most people scoffed at Weaver when he made Ripken a SS. I think he could have been comparable in the field to Cal.
arod could have been beloved. he's smarmy, though, so lots of people hate him. He's a great player, though.
who's better? given a time machine, and you can draft them, who would you take in an amateur draft, assuming they are both 18, and a general knowledge they will both turn out to be who they actually became.
talk amongst yourselves.
Pages: 1