November 04, 2011 at 01:55PM View BBCode
On the Stealing settings, there really needs to be an extra box/choice against non-qualified catchers.November 04, 2011 at 05:12PM View BBCode
great point, great idea, totally agree, let's get this done!November 04, 2011 at 05:49PM View BBCode
i have always understood that the prefs look at the adjusted arm rating- that is, the 2B's arm at catcher after the oop penalty. i may be mistaken in that though.November 04, 2011 at 07:38PM View BBCode
they do. the non catchers give up tons and tons of steals. if you have your runners set to run ultra agressively on the less than A arms, its a track meet.November 05, 2011 at 05:30AM View BBCode
I assumed it considered this, but I don't think it does. The above guy was not run on any more than the average catcher. I've seen this on two other players who caught the majority of their team's games and they were not stolen on any more frequently either.November 05, 2011 at 02:10PM View BBCode
you are correct actually. the successful percentage is so high it makes me think of it like a track meet. the attempts are about the same (in other words, for the attempt, it looks at whatever the arm rating is that is shown). its probably a tanking thing, its so easy to get a non catcher in there (all you have to do is pinch hit out for them, if your league rules demand they must start) you don't want to reward it (when the folks want the team to lose) by giving all these extra attempts, almost all of which are going to be sucessful (at least until the thing gets its catcher percentage up a lot).Pages: 1