 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Football Beta Testing » Football Beta Test Discussion » 2OL
dirtdevil
when i switched the fatigue settings back to 75%, my team got a little better. when I switched back to a 'normal' offence, my team got a bit better. then this year I went to a 2OL system.
prior to the switch we were 4-3, scoring 138 points (19.7/gm) and allowing 11 sacks in 7 games. after the switch we were 6-3, scoring 236 points (26.2/gm) and allowing another 11 sacks in 9 games. so in an admittedly small sample size, our offence improved by a full TD per game by using two OL.
I don't think that's enough data to draw any kind of real conclusions, but the trend might be suggestive.
2OL
May 29, 2014 at 02:31PM View BBCode
so I've been running things differently here in beta than I normally would, to see what impact different things have. I started out with a 65% fatigue setting and no formational subs, other than those required by the formation- NB, SR and nickel LB. I also used a purely shotgun offence. in general, my defence has been pretty good here in terms of pints allowed, but the offence has been poor.when i switched the fatigue settings back to 75%, my team got a little better. when I switched back to a 'normal' offence, my team got a bit better. then this year I went to a 2OL system.
prior to the switch we were 4-3, scoring 138 points (19.7/gm) and allowing 11 sacks in 7 games. after the switch we were 6-3, scoring 236 points (26.2/gm) and allowing another 11 sacks in 9 games. so in an admittedly small sample size, our offence improved by a full TD per game by using two OL.
I don't think that's enough data to draw any kind of real conclusions, but the trend might be suggestive.
Pages: 1