September 07, 2008 at 08:32PM View BBCode
[color=Black]Who would get the nod?[/color]September 07, 2008 at 08:34PM View BBCode
barry bonds, without question. people forget that he won something like 5 mvp's and a slew of gold gloves BEFORE the roids.September 07, 2008 at 08:48PM View BBCode
Barry Bonds and Alex Rodriguez are the only ones in the argument.September 07, 2008 at 10:08PM View BBCode
In order for players who played their entire career after 1980 (so not Brett, Schmidt, etc)September 07, 2008 at 10:18PM View BBCode
Originally posted by barterer2002
In order for players who played their entire career after 1980 (so not Brett, Schmidt, etc)
Bonds
A-Rod
Clemens
Maddux
Johnson
Biggio
Griffey
Henderson
Raines
I. Rodriguez
September 07, 2008 at 10:25PM View BBCode
Originally posted by barterer2002[color=Black][/color]
In order for players who played their entire career after 1980 (so not Brett, Schmidt, etc)
Bonds
A-Rod
Clemens
Maddux
Johnson
Biggio
Griffey
Henderson
Raines
I. Rodriguez
September 07, 2008 at 10:33PM View BBCode
Originally posted by whiskybear
No love for Jack Clark?
September 07, 2008 at 10:37PM View BBCode
He deserves consideration, yes.September 07, 2008 at 10:40PM View BBCode
Wendel's got nothing on William -- and I mean the explorer.September 07, 2008 at 10:58PM View BBCode
Originally posted by whiskybear
Can he score? Please -- talk to Sacajawea.
September 08, 2008 at 01:14AM View BBCode
If you take roids out of the equation then it's clearly Bonds. If you don't, then you're head will probably explode. The fact that everyone hated him doesn't change the numbers--the man was the most dangerous hitter in the game for a very long time.September 08, 2008 at 01:34AM View BBCode
Bonds is the second best player in the history of baseball.September 08, 2008 at 02:41AM View formatted
September 08, 2008 at 05:12AM View BBCode
not taking into account the extenuating circumstances.September 08, 2008 at 05:36AM View BBCode
Also not taking into account baserunning, defense and general assholery.