April 04, 2009 at 01:41PM View BBCode
I had a feeling this move wasn't going to help Detroit. Granted, he is a great player. But also granted, he complains alot and overall that kills chemistry. So what you don't like coming off the bench. You're injured so suck it it up. I sincerly doubt that he will ever win a ring at this point.April 04, 2009 at 10:38PM View BBCode
He was a great player earlier in his career, he took a beaten every night, but was never afraid to get in the paint to score. It's a shame he wasn't setup with championship caliber players in his prime. Your right at this point he is not what he was. He is getting older and is starting to feel it, I don't think he has ever been a prime example of a team player. I didn't see how picking him up helped Detroit when they got him and even more so now.April 04, 2009 at 11:11PM View BBCode
The Iverson trade was never for now, it was made in order to be a player in free agency this summer and next. With him and likely Wallace out, they'll have, you know, oodles of cap room. They wouldn't have had a chance at a title with Billups, anyway, so it was probably the right move to make.April 05, 2009 at 01:14AM View BBCode
Originally posted by Kuroshi It's a shame he wasn't setup with championship caliber players in his prime.
April 05, 2009 at 03:46AM View BBCode
Yea, it's unlikely that a team with Iverson as its star was ever going to win a title. Maybe he could have coexisted with, say, Garnett, but who censored knows. I don't really think it's any fault of his own, just as I don't think it is Jamal Crawford's fault that a team heavily relying on him isn't going to be very good.April 08, 2009 at 06:39PM View formatted
April 08, 2009 at 06:49PM View BBCode
In terms of team basketball, he was never a very good player at all. As Eric mentioned, this was never about improving the team as much as clearing room for free agency spending. I doubt anyone running an NBA team is under any illusion that Iverson has anything left, really...April 08, 2009 at 08:07PM View BBCode
Originally posted by sycophantman
In terms of team basketball, he was never a very good player at all.
April 08, 2009 at 08:16PM View BBCode
I took him to mean the team basketball thing in a very literal sense, in that whole "Detroit Pistons circa '04 are the Mecca" type way. But, yea. He obviously contributed heavily to his team's success, just as much as someone like, I don't know, Dwight Howard.April 08, 2009 at 11:26PM View BBCode
Dwight Howard is probably my favorite player in the NBA right now, after Chris Paul, naturally.April 08, 2009 at 11:40PM View BBCode
The Tyranny of the Big Man ... you, Aaron?April 08, 2009 at 11:46PM View BBCode
Howard's pretty cool, but his lack of real offensive moves or passing sort of leave me wondering "what if". So I jock Pau, of course... as far as big guys go, anyway (and not counting Duncan).Pages: 1