March 28, 2014 at 09:29PM View BBCode
in case we ever decided to re-examine the decline age, or if the declines of MLB players is just something that blows your hair back, here's a report on it:March 28, 2014 at 11:18PM View formatted
March 30, 2014 at 08:57PM View BBCode
What the overall value of the contract ignores is that Detroit isn't overly concerned with the "bad money" at the end of the deal, their focus was ensuring that they locked up the best hitter in baseball through his prime years. That was the focus of Neil Paine's [url=http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/how-bad-was-the-cabrera-deal/]article[/url] in 538.March 30, 2014 at 10:26PM View BBCode
the part i dont understand is how 1 win is worth $6.5M. The way I read that, it tells me that a 50-win team should have a $300 million payroll. I'm sure that can't be what they're saying...what did I miss?March 31, 2014 at 04:28AM View BBCode
A win is this sense is a win over replacement value, so the hypothetical team of "replacement"players wouldn't win 0 games they would likely win 50-60.April 01, 2014 at 02:30AM View BBCode
But here's the real reason why it was a good signing.April 01, 2014 at 03:20AM View BBCode
it's a stupid contract and it's going to be an albatross at some point.April 01, 2014 at 03:34AM View BBCode
Originally posted by tworoosters
But here's the real reason why it was a good signing.
April 01, 2014 at 04:18AM View BBCode
thats awesome, he's hammering pitches outside the strike zone box on all 4 sides. and the strike zone box goes way up to the letters, i thought that was only true in rule books.Pages: 1