January 21, 2014 at 12:51AM View BBCode
I have a suggestion for the Owner's all time leader board. The one stat that seems to be the most complete stat when it comes to an owners ability appears to be the prestige per season. I suggest that we do a prestige per season stat on the all time leaders board. Minimum amount of season's played would need to be at least 50 seasons I would think. Any reason why this stat wouldn't work? It's odd for me to see owners at the top of the leader boards in certain categories and those owners don't even have a winning record. I feel a stat like this would truly show the ability of the great owners on this site. To be eligible that owner has to have at least one active league currently. That would weed out all of the one's that changed their names or bailed on the site.May 22, 2014 at 01:23PM View BBCode
I agree but would vote for a 100 season minimum or 50 season and at least 1 active team for any % based catagories.May 23, 2014 at 02:54AM View BBCode
Prestige per season is really the only meaningful bit of data to be gleaned from the owner cards (IMO) and it is silly that we can't sort by that stat. So I agree with the OP.May 29, 2014 at 04:58PM View BBCode
does six suck? I would like to at least ........suck.May 29, 2014 at 04:59PM View formatted
May 29, 2014 at 05:09PM View BBCode
of course it is. those ninth inning things, they are clutch.May 30, 2014 at 02:53AM View BBCode
I think that Dynasty owners should be excluded from all leader boards, because you know ..............Dynasty sucks.Pages: 1