Sim Dynasty

View Old Forum Thread

Old Forum Index » Other Stuff » Sports Talk » Peavy's Triple Crown
rkinslow19

Peavy's Triple Crown

November 16, 2007 at 02:53AM View BBCode

Peavy won the triple crown - leading the league in wins, era, and K's

Peavy, and the other 3 to do it in the NL:

Peavy 19/2.54/240
Johnson 24/2.32/334
Gooden 24/1.53/268
Carlton 27/1.97/310

This entire post is plagarized from an espn article. You can read the original [url=http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3112132]here[/url]
barterer2002

November 16, 2007 at 03:52AM View BBCode

Originally posted by rkinslow19
Peavy won the triple crown - leading the league in wins, era, and K's

Peavy, and the other 3 to do it in the NL:

Peavy 19/2.54/240
Johnson 24/2.32/334
Gooden 24/1.53/268
Carlton 27/1.97/310

This entire post is plagarized from an espn article. You can read the original [url=http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3112132]here[/url]


I haven't read the article because the implication here is that there have only ever been 4 pitchers to win the NL triple crown which is just not true.

Peavy's accomplishment is the 19th time it has happened in NL history. Its also happened 15 times in the AL and once in the AA.
rkinslow19

November 16, 2007 at 04:48AM View BBCode

Originally posted by barterer2002
Originally posted by rkinslow19
Peavy won the triple crown - leading the league in wins, era, and K's

Peavy, and the other 3 to do it in the NL:

Peavy 19/2.54/240
Johnson 24/2.32/334
Gooden 24/1.53/268
Carlton 27/1.97/310

This entire post is plagarized from an espn article. You can read the original [url=http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3112132]here[/url]


I haven't read the article because the implication here is that there have only ever been 4 pitchers to win the NL triple crown which is just not true.

Peavy's accomplishment is the 19th time it has happened in NL history. Its also happened 15 times in the AL and once in the AA.


Sorry, 4 in 40 years.
barterer2002

November 16, 2007 at 01:49PM View BBCode

It's still a rather misleading stat-typical of the ESPN stat gurus. You could similarly call it the 2nd in 20 years or 3rd in 30 years for the NL. When you draw lines like that without any reason behind where you (and when I say you I mean them) draw them its just misleading. Its something that ESPN is very good at.

Pages: 1