December 06, 2005 at 11:33PM View BBCode
[url=http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/article.jsp?ymd=20051206&content_id=1277144&vkey=hotstove2005&fext=.jsp]5 years, 55 millions[/url]December 07, 2005 at 12:05AM View BBCode
First B.J. Ryan and now this. J.P. Riccardi is digging himself into a big hole with these contracts, but apparently the Jays' ownership approves because they just extended his contract through 2010. If Burnett ever fully realizes his potential it may end up being a good deal, but he's had a long injury history and hasn't been able to capitalize on his talent yet.December 07, 2005 at 12:11AM View BBCode
I heard on the radio that there is an out clause for both sides after 3 yearsDecember 07, 2005 at 12:14AM View BBCode
I'm not sure if that's correct. The way I heard it is that Burnett can opt out of the deal after three years, but if he doesn't I believe the Blue Jays are stuck with him for the entire 5 years. I could be wrong about that though.December 07, 2005 at 12:26AM View BBCode
You are most likely right. If his agent allowed Toronto an out then he is an idiot. this is MLB where contract where every contract is guaranteed. I'm sure there are other teams that offered at least 4 years so to accept a deal that a team can void after 3 years would be a bad move on his partDecember 07, 2005 at 04:27AM View BBCode
This is a great thread title.December 09, 2005 at 12:06PM View BBCode
wow that's YAZ now?December 09, 2005 at 04:40PM View BBCode
These contracts the Jays are giving out must be in Canadian Dollars or something.December 09, 2005 at 04:49PM View BBCode
But why would you possibly want Millwood? He's one of the most overrated pitchers in the majors today by some. He doesn't have heart and is a decent third or fourth starter but fails when asked to do more than that.December 09, 2005 at 05:00PM View BBCode
Millwood's a good pitcher - his career WHIP is about 1.24. He's probably the best free agent pitcher available this winter.December 09, 2005 at 05:02PM View BBCode
Oops - i suppose I should have clicked the link. I really thought they gave Park that kind of money!December 09, 2005 at 05:04PM View BBCode
I'd probably rather have Burnett than Millwood because of his age.December 09, 2005 at 05:13PM View BBCode
Millwood has his role. Its as the 3rd starter. I lost any remaining respect I might have had for him when he had to take a chair out to the on deck circle because it was too humid for him in Florida. What a piece of shit.December 09, 2005 at 06:32PM View BBCode
Here are the ten pitchers who are most similar to AJ Burnett through age 28:December 09, 2005 at 06:42PM View BBCode
For the most part all of those guys are pre Tommy John surgery pitchers, when an injury like Burnett's would have been a career death sentence. TJ surgery has changed the rules of the game for guys like Burnett, and comparing him to 60's and 70's pitchers who didn't have that opportunity is not terribly instructive.December 09, 2005 at 07:11PM View BBCode
Fair enough. Let's restrict the discussion to the post-1970 pitchers (Guzman, Terrell, Andujar, and Hanson), and the guys who didn't get hurt (Larsen, Renko). Does that bode lots better for Toronto? I'm not sure it does.December 09, 2005 at 07:36PM View BBCode
This is a 28/29 year old pitcher coming off of Tommy John surgery, which nowadays means that his elbow is basically set, and any injury concerns he could potentially have would have to be in another part of his arm. That is a huge bonus these days, since TJ surgery is almost routine and it's better to get a guy after it than before. The contract is for 5 years - a decent amount of time but not a ridiculously long one, since he'll still be in the 33/34 range when it's up and therefore not likely to be ineffective simply because of age. Therefore, even if he's only mediocre it's still a tradeable contract, since teams will always take a chance on a league-average pitcher with electric stuff who's under 35. Burnett's strikeout rates have usually been stellar (except for the 2001 season), so there's no concern that he's just gotten hit lucky or benefitted from an exceptional defense. He was well above-average in 2005, another positive sign from a guy getting back from TJ surgery. Bottom line here is that 55 million is a lot of money, and people are going to focus on the fact that he's 49-50 in his career, but there are a lot of positives here and 11 million per year to a pitcher who can potentially be a #1-type starter and who will still be under 35 when the contract is up is not that ridiculous. This is a much more defensible signing than the BJ Ryan deal.December 09, 2005 at 08:32PM View BBCode
I really don't have the problem with the Burnett signing that many do. Did Toronto overpay, probably. Would anyone go to a Canadian team in any sport if they weren't overpaid, probably not. The thing about Burnett on the Blue Jays is that he isn't going to have to be the number one starter, the Blue Jays already have that in Halliday so he can be comforable as the number two and right now is probably the best number two starter in the division.December 09, 2005 at 08:38PM View BBCode
Well, I suppose that relative to the other stupidity going on, it's not an indefensible deal. It's just a sorry state of affairs when owners are willing to give a 5-year, $55 million deal to a pitcher with a sub-.500 career record who walked out on his team last year. It certainly can't be any worse a deal than Park has been for Texas, or Darren Dreifort for the Dodgers.December 09, 2005 at 10:27PM View BBCode
Well, I will say that Burnett does something most guys can't- Hits 100 MPH on the radar gun even into the the 9th inning on some games last year. Guys who can dunk from the free throw line & show any sign of being able to shoot, get a lot of extra money also.December 11, 2005 at 01:48PM View BBCode
Originally posted by BrutusKhan
On Lynwth's list above, Turnbow throws a 100, and did a legit job last year, and Eckersly was a drunk when he was a SP, sobered up, and was a god in the pen.
Pages: 1