 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Other Stuff » Sports Talk » Super Bowl Prop Bets - What's your Pleasure ?
tworoosters
"Baba O'Reilly" and "Won't get fooled Again" are the betting favorites at 9/4 and "My Generation" goes off at 11/4 with "Substitute" a surprising fave at 5-1.
I'm thinking I'll put $20 down on "Who are you ?" at 12-1 and maybe parlay it with the "over" on the National Anthem (1 minute 38.5 seconds).
Super Bowl Prop Bets - What's your Pleasure ?
February 02, 2010 at 08:16PM View BBCode
My fave is: Which song will "The Who" open with for the Half Time show ?"Baba O'Reilly" and "Won't get fooled Again" are the betting favorites at 9/4 and "My Generation" goes off at 11/4 with "Substitute" a surprising fave at 5-1.
I'm thinking I'll put $20 down on "Who are you ?" at 12-1 and maybe parlay it with the "over" on the National Anthem (1 minute 38.5 seconds).
FuriousGiorge
Go with "My Generation."
February 02, 2010 at 08:21PM View formatted
You are viewing the raw post code; this allows you to copy a message with BBCode formatting intact.
Oh man, we need a link for this stuff.
Go with "My Generation."
shep1582
Hope I die before I get old...
I hope it's Happy Jack.
February 02, 2010 at 08:30PM View BBCode
what's the odds one of them will go into cardiac arrest during the show?Hope I die before I get old...
I hope it's Happy Jack.
tworoosters
"We're kinda doing a mashup of stuff. A bit of 'Baba O'Riley,' a bit of 'Pinball Wizard,' a bit of the close of 'Tommy,' a bit of 'Who Are You,' and a bit of 'Won't Get Fooled Again.'?
The original odds can be found [url=http://news.sportsinteraction.com/sports/nfl-football/super-bowl-prop-betting-whos-halftime-show-song/]here[/url].
February 02, 2010 at 09:30PM View BBCode
Happy Jack was 150-1 , apparently the "first song" bets have come off the board since Pete Townsend told Billboard that:"We're kinda doing a mashup of stuff. A bit of 'Baba O'Riley,' a bit of 'Pinball Wizard,' a bit of the close of 'Tommy,' a bit of 'Who Are You,' and a bit of 'Won't Get Fooled Again.'?
The original odds can be found [url=http://news.sportsinteraction.com/sports/nfl-football/super-bowl-prop-betting-whos-halftime-show-song/]here[/url].
Tyles
February 02, 2010 at 09:39PM View BBCode
That would be like Bob Dylan opening with Like A Rolling Stone. I doubt they shoot their load right out of the gate.
Lou.
And you fucks stop hating on The Who. They're the only reason I'm watching the Super Bowl this year.
February 03, 2010 at 01:15AM View BBCode
It wouldn't be the same without Keith, but a montage like "A Quick One While He's Away" could go the entire set without having to switch gears. Three or four songs in one, 10ish minutes... We have a winner.And you fucks stop hating on The Who. They're the only reason I'm watching the Super Bowl this year.
shep1582
for this thread it should be "You better you bet"
February 03, 2010 at 02:08AM View BBCode
doh!for this thread it should be "You better you bet"
cubfan531
February 03, 2010 at 05:19AM View BBCode
Whoever bet on Boris The Spider deserves to lose their money. I liked Entwistle and all, but, seriously, that song has no spot in the Super Bowl.
tworoosters
I see no Who hating in this thread.
[Edited on 2-3-2010 by tworoosters]
February 03, 2010 at 06:11AM View BBCode
Originally posted by Lou.
And you fucks stop hating on The Who.
I see no Who hating in this thread.
[Edited on 2-3-2010 by tworoosters]
JLlamas
February 06, 2010 at 06:41AM View BBCode
Out of curiosity, for those of who are placing bets, what website or whatnot are you going through?
shep1582
scroll down past the article in tr's link, and they're all there.
February 08, 2010 at 02:18AM View BBCode
8/1scroll down past the article in tr's link, and they're all there.
Lou.
February 08, 2010 at 03:03AM View BBCode
Just glad they played that teenage wasteland thing in its entirety. Just like the concert for nyc. But not quite as big...
sycophantman
February 08, 2010 at 03:10AM View BBCode
Didn't the Who kinda suck? I can't be the only one to think this?
shep1582
I liked the show. Their voices are shot, but I thought the music was pretty well synced up and on time.
I think I'm in the minority though. Benne thought they sucked. He was embarrassed. (see the SB thread for his comments)
February 08, 2010 at 03:23AM View BBCode
the were so much better than the Stones were several years ago, maybe the bar isn't very high anymore.I liked the show. Their voices are shot, but I thought the music was pretty well synced up and on time.
I think I'm in the minority though. Benne thought they sucked. He was embarrassed. (see the SB thread for his comments)
sycophantman
February 08, 2010 at 03:24AM View BBCode
Well never mind, Rolling Stone has declared the Whos performance as amazing, and baby boomers are defending the act by asking how well you'd rock if you were a tired and irrelevent 60 years old. Sorry, then, I must have misremembered them singing and playing like drunk buffaloes careening off a cliff, my bad.
shep1582
I was never a big fan, anyway, so it wasn't like my heroes were sucking.
I thought they were pretty good for a bunch of old farts.
February 08, 2010 at 03:26AM View BBCode
I guess I wasn't expecting much, so when they were decent, musically, if not vocally, I guess I was pleasantly surprised.I was never a big fan, anyway, so it wasn't like my heroes were sucking.
I thought they were pretty good for a bunch of old farts.
sycophantman
I guess it just struck me as arrogant on their part to think they could coast as though their entire audience were older guys reliving their youth by going to their show. Most viewers came away from that performance with a much more negative opinion of the band than they did before, if they even had one at all to begin with. Just a waste of everyones time.
February 08, 2010 at 03:32AM View BBCode
Yeah, it was just a wasted halftime show, if they'd at least made an effort to play competently and make some new fans it would be fine, but they just seemed tired and disinterested. I'm no fan, really, not even a little, but I had wished that they could at least bother to play for the majority of the audience watching the Super Bowl that didn't know them at all and was hearing them for the first time.I guess it just struck me as arrogant on their part to think they could coast as though their entire audience were older guys reliving their youth by going to their show. Most viewers came away from that performance with a much more negative opinion of the band than they did before, if they even had one at all to begin with. Just a waste of everyones time.
shep1582
phish would have been a much better choice.
February 08, 2010 at 03:38AM View BBCode
it doesn't help that they only get 15 minutes or so.phish would have been a much better choice.
sycophantman
(!)
(No.)
February 08, 2010 at 03:40AM View BBCode
Originally posted by shep1582
phish would have been a much better choice.
(!)
(No.)
shep1582
and they are the awesome.
February 08, 2010 at 03:43AM View BBCode
the made their fame on the net. they have a devoted following. they would rocked with some energy. they just came off tour, so they'd be in the concert mode.and they are the awesome.
FuriousGiorge
February 08, 2010 at 03:45AM View BBCode
Phish didn't make their fame on the internet. And the Who were unwatchable.
sycophantman
It's not my cup of tea, but they should go with a major country music star for the next one.
February 08, 2010 at 03:48AM View BBCode
Eh, I don't think Phish would be a legitimate choice for a halftime show. Top priority would be a band that is well known, and the Phish don't really have a single legitimate hit to their credit. Plus, my goodness, they're a jam band, that is pretty much propaganda music for filthy hippies right there.It's not my cup of tea, but they should go with a major country music star for the next one.
shep1582
they were ahead of the curve when it came to: a website, file sharing amongst their fans, message boards to talk about the previous night's shows. they have never had a major label deal.
they started in colleges in the NE, but there fame came via the internet.
and the Who were just fine. Especially for a bunch of fogies.
as usual, if you don't like it, it sucks. which is just a juvenile attitude to have.
February 08, 2010 at 03:57AM View BBCode
their concerts were downloadable long before any other band.they were ahead of the curve when it came to: a website, file sharing amongst their fans, message boards to talk about the previous night's shows. they have never had a major label deal.
they started in colleges in the NE, but there fame came via the internet.
and the Who were just fine. Especially for a bunch of fogies.
as usual, if you don't like it, it sucks. which is just a juvenile attitude to have.
Pages: 1 2