 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Other Stuff » Sports Talk » More Bavasi
Smocko
Two words: Jeremy Reed.
:spin:
More Bavasi
November 07, 2005 at 10:04PM View BBCode
[url=http://www.realgmbaseball.com/src_wiretap_archives/1252/20051107/mariners_could_deal_for_pavano_or_delgado/]Pavano to Mariners?[/url]Two words: Jeremy Reed.
:spin:
FuriousGiorge
November 07, 2005 at 10:26PM View BBCode
Jesus. Can someone please inform the Mariners that they are not players in the American League, and they can stop going after overpaid players in a futile attempt to win a pennant with the motley collection of ballplayers they have.
JollyGreenGiant
November 08, 2005 at 05:08AM View BBCode
They should also consider trading for Jim Thome... He would be just as overpaid and unproductive as Pavano. Perfect fit!
kujayhawks15
November 08, 2005 at 07:20AM View formatted
You are viewing the raw post code; this allows you to copy a message with BBCode formatting intact.
Atleast the Royals don't think they can compete every year, I'd rather see our "future" playing, as bad as it may be, rather than overpaid veterans. But that's just me.
BrutusKhan
Now, Thome to the Mariners would actually be a little scary. Which injury prone guy plays DH, Sexson or Thome?
As for trading for overpaid players, usually you get to acquire them a lot cheaper because of the contract. So, I doubt they'd have to give up Jeremy Reed if the league feels Pavano's contract is bogus.
November 08, 2005 at 04:55PM View BBCode
Speaking of Royals, why is Sisco not starting? He's a big guy, the team needs SP, and he's got the potential to be awesome. They already have a couple of closer candidates.Now, Thome to the Mariners would actually be a little scary. Which injury prone guy plays DH, Sexson or Thome?
As for trading for overpaid players, usually you get to acquire them a lot cheaper because of the contract. So, I doubt they'd have to give up Jeremy Reed if the league feels Pavano's contract is bogus.
DougB
November 08, 2005 at 05:47PM View BBCode
Ugeth Urbina is also available. But he can't call. He used that call already.
FuriousGiorge
"Well, I talked to him, then I yelled at him for a bit, then I showed him the gun I had in my pocket. At that point, when he didn't respond, I saw no alternative but to light him on fire."
[Edited on 11-8-2005 by FuriousGiorge]
November 08, 2005 at 06:48PM View BBCode
At what point does "setting someone else on fire" enter a person's mind when they're looking for payback? Do people really do that sort of thing outside of Charles Bronson movies?"Well, I talked to him, then I yelled at him for a bit, then I showed him the gun I had in my pocket. At that point, when he didn't respond, I saw no alternative but to light him on fire."
[Edited on 11-8-2005 by FuriousGiorge]
Pages: 1