 |
View Old Forum Thread
Old Forum Index » Other Stuff » Sports Talk » The college football thread
thatrogue
January 09, 2009 at 01:47PM View BBCode
With Florida having beaten then #1 Alabama and then #1 Oklahoma in consecutive games, I think I'd have a problem with anyone else being ranked #1 right now. But I do understand the sentiment.
barterer2002
January 09, 2009 at 07:37PM View formatted
You are viewing the raw post code; this allows you to copy a message with BBCode formatting intact.
Well you're a Florida fan and I don't see an argument about why they shouldn't be the National Champ however I also don't see an argument about why one of the other three shouldn't either.
Bones2484
Before the NC game was even played, it was very easy to argue that any of the top 5 (or even 6) teams could have been there instead.
At this point I don't think you can argue that Florida deserves to be ranked first, but any of the top 6 could have won a NC game against any of the others this season. It just happened that Florida and Oklahoma were annointed as the ones given the chance to, and that is what is wrong with the system.
[Edited on 1-9-2009 by Bones2484]
January 09, 2009 at 07:42PM View BBCode
Originally posted by thatrogue
With Florida having beaten then #1 Alabama and then #1 Oklahoma in consecutive games, I think I'd have a problem with anyone else being ranked #1 right now. But I do understand the sentiment.
Before the NC game was even played, it was very easy to argue that any of the top 5 (or even 6) teams could have been there instead.
At this point I don't think you can argue that Florida deserves to be ranked first, but any of the top 6 could have won a NC game against any of the others this season. It just happened that Florida and Oklahoma were annointed as the ones given the chance to, and that is what is wrong with the system.
[Edited on 1-9-2009 by Bones2484]
Benne
Granted, they got their clock cleaned by Oklahoma, but they also beat BYU and Boise St., and gave Utah a run for their money, so they're not total chumps. (Plus, there's something to be said for willing to play OU at Norman)
I'd rather not rehash the Texas debate, but I think they and USC are pretty much a toss-up, and would've made a much more entertaining Rose Bowl matchup than PSU.
January 10, 2009 at 01:57AM View BBCode
I'm also surprised that TCU is getting that much love (from you and the AP voters). I have a hard time believing they would beat Alabama, Penn State or Georgia.
Granted, they got their clock cleaned by Oklahoma, but they also beat BYU and Boise St., and gave Utah a run for their money, so they're not total chumps. (Plus, there's something to be said for willing to play OU at Norman)
I'd rather not rehash the Texas debate, but I think they and USC are pretty much a toss-up, and would've made a much more entertaining Rose Bowl matchup than PSU.
rkinslow19
After watching the Fiesta Bowl, I think not.
January 12, 2009 at 04:31AM View BBCode
Originally posted by Benne
I'd rather not rehash the Texas debate, but I think they and USC are pretty much a toss-up, and would've made a much more entertaining Rose Bowl matchup than PSU.
After watching the Fiesta Bowl, I think not.
rkinslow19
I have a big issue with Texas even being considered.
They didn't win their conference. We've been through this before, but for me, winning your conference is a prerequisite to winning the nation.
January 12, 2009 at 04:33AM View BBCode
Originally posted by barterer2002
Truthfully I wouldn't have an issue with any of the top 4 (Florida, Utah, Texas or USC) being national champion this year.
I have a big issue with Texas even being considered.
They didn't win their conference. We've been through this before, but for me, winning your conference is a prerequisite to winning the nation.
FuriousGiorge
Because none of those teams won the national championship game except for Florida. The end.
January 13, 2009 at 05:10AM View BBCode
Originally posted by barterer2002
Well you're a Florida fan and I don't see an argument about why they shouldn't be the National Champ however I also don't see an argument about why one of the other three shouldn't either.
Because none of those teams won the national championship game except for Florida. The end.
barterer2002
January 13, 2009 at 12:58PM View BBCode
The only reason that argument is acceptable is if you buy into the notion that there actually is a national championship game. If we accept the fact that the BCS is right and that 1v2 according to a complicated formula is a "National Championship Game" then you are correct. On the other hand if we don't accept that particular premise then arguments could be made for the other teams, including Texas.
FuriousGiorge
January 13, 2009 at 03:20PM View BBCode
That is the entire premise around which college football is based. You may not like it, you may wish the system was different, but as long as that's the system that is in place, then that is the result we have. Making arguments for other teams to be "national champions" might be fun, but so is masturbating, and we don't talk about that in polite company.
rkinslow19
Except the winner of the BCS game isn't recognized as the national champion by the NCAA
January 17, 2009 at 10:44PM View BBCode
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
That is the entire premise around which college football is based. You may not like it, you may wish the system was different, but as long as that's the system that is in place, then that is the result we have. Making arguments for other teams to be "national champions" might be fun, but so is masturbating, and we don't talk about that in polite company.
Except the winner of the BCS game isn't recognized as the national champion by the NCAA
FuriousGiorge
January 18, 2009 at 01:27AM View BBCode
So? They don't recognize anyone, that's their shtick. That's always been their shtick. I'm not really sure why it's relevant. I realize that people are still fighting against the BCS and everything, because people like to fight silly, losing battles. The BCS champion is, very simply, the champion. Everything else is just noise.
tm4559
now, when the BCS thing crowned USC as the "champion" it was the awesome. now that it didn't, we "have problems," or we point out the "winner of the BCS isn't recognized...etc."
if you like that thing sometime, then you just have to like it all the time. the style points system on which it is based (after you get past the records, you get into all this comparing scedules and yardage and winning on the road and losing at home and all junk, right?) was supposed to be objectively better than the polls of old, was it not?
January 18, 2009 at 04:03PM View BBCode
really. the whole BCS thing came out because occasionally the AP and the UPI recognized a different "national champion." this happened so seldom, really, that i never could figure out why anyone really cared.now, when the BCS thing crowned USC as the "champion" it was the awesome. now that it didn't, we "have problems," or we point out the "winner of the BCS isn't recognized...etc."
if you like that thing sometime, then you just have to like it all the time. the style points system on which it is based (after you get past the records, you get into all this comparing scedules and yardage and winning on the road and losing at home and all junk, right?) was supposed to be objectively better than the polls of old, was it not?
rkinslow19
I think it's funny how adamant you are about this.
January 18, 2009 at 04:46PM View BBCode
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
So? They don't recognize anyone, that's their shtick. That's always been their shtick. I'm not really sure why it's relevant. I realize that people are still fighting against the BCS and everything, because people like to fight silly, losing battles. The BCS champion is, very simply, the champion. Everything else is just noise.
I think it's funny how adamant you are about this.
rkinslow19
Find a post when I've said the is BCS awesome.
Otherwise, quit your babbling.
[Edited on 1-18-2009 by rkinslow19]
January 18, 2009 at 04:51PM View BBCode
Originally posted by tm4559
now, when the BCS thing crowned USC as the "champion" it was the awesome. now that it didn't, we "have problems," or we point out the "winner of the BCS isn't recognized...etc."
Find a post when I've said the is BCS awesome.
Otherwise, quit your babbling.
[Edited on 1-18-2009 by rkinslow19]
whiskybear
January 18, 2009 at 05:08PM View BBCode
Well, you weren't around here the last time USC won a BCS title game, so the odds of finding any BCS praise out of you are slim. But I doubt you were doing any hand-wringing when the Trojans knocked out the Sooners in that Orange Bowl a few years back.
tm4559
as far as whether you think the BCS is awesome or not, that isn't the point. when the BCS thing put USC into the "championship game" and they won, you embraced that result. now, we have to embrace the result of this season. it is the same thing.
January 18, 2009 at 05:09PM View BBCode
i think the BCS is stupid. but in America, it isn't enough that some teams win, have great seasons, and some folks vote and express a collective opinion about who the best team is. we have to crown a "champion" and identify a loser, you can't do that without a "championship game."as far as whether you think the BCS is awesome or not, that isn't the point. when the BCS thing put USC into the "championship game" and they won, you embraced that result. now, we have to embrace the result of this season. it is the same thing.
FuriousGiorge
You can think whatever you want. Me, I don't recognize the Heat's 2006 title, because I believe that 7 game series are illegitimate and only game 1 counts. So, you know, that's my thing. Dallas Mavericks, 2006 NBA champions.
January 18, 2009 at 05:45PM View BBCode
Originally posted by rkinslow19
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
So? They don't recognize anyone, that's their shtick. That's always been their shtick. I'm not really sure why it's relevant. I realize that people are still fighting against the BCS and everything, because people like to fight silly, losing battles. The BCS champion is, very simply, the champion. Everything else is just noise.
I think it's funny how adamant you are about this.
You can think whatever you want. Me, I don't recognize the Heat's 2006 title, because I believe that 7 game series are illegitimate and only game 1 counts. So, you know, that's my thing. Dallas Mavericks, 2006 NBA champions.
rkinslow19
The NBA does though.
Perhaps you can wear the "Dallas Mavericks NBA Champions" hat with your commemorative "Buffalo Bills 4-peat World Champions" t-shirt
January 18, 2009 at 10:47PM View BBCode
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
Originally posted by rkinslow19
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
So? They don't recognize anyone, that's their shtick. That's always been their shtick. I'm not really sure why it's relevant. I realize that people are still fighting against the BCS and everything, because people like to fight silly, losing battles. The BCS champion is, very simply, the champion. Everything else is just noise.
I think it's funny how adamant you are about this.
You can think whatever you want. Me, I don't recognize the Heat's 2006 title, because I believe that 7 game series are illegitimate and only game 1 counts. So, you know, that's my thing. Dallas Mavericks, 2006 NBA champions.
The NBA does though.
Perhaps you can wear the "Dallas Mavericks NBA Champions" hat with your commemorative "Buffalo Bills 4-peat World Champions" t-shirt
rkinslow19
I didn't embrace it any more than the previous season, when we were AP nat'l champs.
The BCS only decides the Coaches Poll. Nothing else.
January 18, 2009 at 10:49PM View BBCode
Originally posted by tm4559
as far as whether you think the BCS is awesome or not, that isn't the point. when the BCS thing put USC into the "championship game" and they won, you embraced that result. now, we have to embrace the result of this season. it is the same thing.
I didn't embrace it any more than the previous season, when we were AP nat'l champs.
The BCS only decides the Coaches Poll. Nothing else.
whiskybear
January 18, 2009 at 10:50PM View BBCode
The NCAA doesn't recognize the AP No. 1, either, and yet their word is gospel.
tm4559
is that why every sports talking head goes wild all season about the BCS thing, and then all 'em millions of people tune in the game, and then, after the game, my newspaper sports page has this great big headline, something on the order of
"Gators Champion!!!!!!"?
seem like a heap of trouble, when they could just poll the coaches.
January 18, 2009 at 11:20PM View BBCode
Originally posted by rkinslow19
The BCS only decides the Coaches Poll. Nothing else.
is that why every sports talking head goes wild all season about the BCS thing, and then all 'em millions of people tune in the game, and then, after the game, my newspaper sports page has this great big headline, something on the order of
"Gators Champion!!!!!!"?
seem like a heap of trouble, when they could just poll the coaches.
rkinslow19
$$$
January 18, 2009 at 11:28PM View BBCode
Originally posted by tm4559
Originally posted by rkinslow19
The BCS only decides the Coaches Poll. Nothing else.
is that why every sports talking head goes wild all season about the BCS thing, and then all 'em millions of people tune in the game, and then, after the game, my newspaper sports page has this great big headline, something on the order of
"Gators Champion!!!!!!"?
seem like a heap of trouble, when they could just poll the coaches.
$$$
tm4559
the trojans made those guys a mountain of bucks too. and then the BCS went and left them cold, just because they lost one game. what the hell?
January 18, 2009 at 11:30PM View BBCode
*chuckle*the trojans made those guys a mountain of bucks too. and then the BCS went and left them cold, just because they lost one game. what the hell?
rkinslow19
Not gospel, just another voice.
January 18, 2009 at 11:37PM View BBCode
Originally posted by whiskybear
The NCAA doesn't recognize the AP No. 1, either, and yet their word is gospel.
Not gospel, just another voice.