January 12, 2010 at 07:12PM View BBCode
My point was that Junior was the example of a guy giving his home town team a discount and Pujols of giving his current (non-home town) team a discount. I've seen writers/heard reporters use the term interchangeably.January 12, 2010 at 07:13PM View BBCode
jason bay didn't really fit in seattle. as an overpaid player on the down side of his career, he definitely fits with the mets. so it's a win-win, really.January 12, 2010 at 08:45PM View BBCode
The M's weren't all that interested in Jason Bay in the first place. Because the M's are now smart enough to realize that giving Jason Bay $16 million a year is a really bad idea. Thankfully Omar Minaya is still a dumb.January 12, 2010 at 09:14PM View BBCode
So I ask, what should the Mets have done?January 12, 2010 at 09:19PM View BBCode
No one will get paid per year more then A-rod unless it's PujolsJanuary 12, 2010 at 09:23PM View BBCode
If the Mets are such idiots for giving Jason Bay $66 million over four years how dumb are the Cardinals for giving Holliday $120 million over seven years when they were essentially bidding against themselves ?January 12, 2010 at 09:30PM View BBCode
Originally posted by thatrogue
If so, the rotation, fronted by Santana should be decent enough to contend, the bullpen is reasonable, and a lineup core of Reyes, Castillo, Wright, Beltran, Bay, & Francouer would make them more than competitive with the rest of the NL East.
January 12, 2010 at 09:46PM View BBCode
god. it is just too easy.January 12, 2010 at 11:16PM View BBCode
Pujols was not a hometown discount in '04. It was a arb years buyout. He specifically said at that point he wanted market value, that there would be "no hometown discount".January 12, 2010 at 11:25PM View BBCode
i believe albert's contract will be the biggest in baseball, but something less than he could conceivably get somewhere else, yes.January 13, 2010 at 12:46AM View BBCode
to his credit, Brady gave the Pats that discount.January 13, 2010 at 12:53AM View BBCode
Originally posted by shep1582
Why anyone sides with the owners in any of these contract/union squabbles amazes me.
January 13, 2010 at 01:00AM View BBCode
Brady isn't relevant. Football has a salary cap and so its incumbent upon a player like Brady not to hold out for every last dollar so that other players around him can also be of quality. If Brady wanted to stretch the market as far as he could the Pats would be unable to sign others because of the finite amount the NFL teams are allowed to spend.January 13, 2010 at 01:27AM View BBCode
i mean youd think, he wouldnt leave 50 million on the table, but who knows, think about it.. a couple million dollars for anyone is more then enough to live on, some are just very greedyJanuary 13, 2010 at 02:19AM View BBCode
Originally posted by barterer2002
Brady isn't relevant. Football has a salary cap and so its incumbent upon a player like Brady not to hold out for every last dollar so that other players around him can also be of quality. If Brady wanted to stretch the market as far as he could the Pats would be unable to sign others because of the finite amount the NFL teams are allowed to spend.
January 13, 2010 at 10:42AM View BBCode
Originally posted by FacemanIf that is the case, then Albert has the longest arb period in history. As a player that came up in 2001, his arb seasons would have been 2004 - 2006...yet his current contract extends through 2011 (assuming the Cards would exercise the option if they can't get another extension signed by then), at an AAV somewhere around $14.5 million. Considering what Jeter, A-Rod and Bonds were making per year in 2004, and Albert's stats to that point, he did not sign for "market value".
Pujols was not a hometown discount in '04. It was a arb years buyout. He specifically said at that point he wanted market value, that there would be "no hometown discount".
There is talk of one for his next (and last) contract.
January 13, 2010 at 01:29PM View BBCode
Originally posted by barterer2002Well Bryan, they were competitive in 2006, 2007 and 2008. Riddled with injuries, they were not competitve in 2009.
Originally posted by thatrogue
If so, the rotation, fronted by Santana should be decent enough to contend, the bullpen is reasonable, and a lineup core of Reyes, Castillo, Wright, Beltran, Bay, & Francouer would make them more than competitive with the rest of the NL East.
Same song, different year
January 13, 2010 at 02:55PM View BBCode
The 2006 rotation was Glavine, Traschel, Pedro (pre-injury), El Duque & Maine. 2007 saw Maine increase his starts, while Pedro and Traschel were replaced by Ollie Perez & Mike Pelfrey. 2008 was Santana's first season in NY (replacing Glavine), with Pedro coming back from injury (before getting injured again) to replace El Duque.January 13, 2010 at 03:02PM View formatted
January 13, 2010 at 03:44PM View BBCode
C - LoDuca was a turd...horribly overrated both offensively and defensively. Assuming they get Molina (far from a foregone conclusion, but that appears to be the Mets plan), I'd suggest he is a slight upgrade from their catching situation the past several seasons.January 14, 2010 at 04:27AM View BBCode
But of course, injuries and team disfunction could render my point moot, and crush any optimism a fan could want to have...January 14, 2010 at 03:25PM View BBCode
Originally posted by thatrogue
Originally posted by FacemanIf that is the case, then Albert has the longest arb period in history. As a player that came up in 2001, his arb seasons would have been 2004 - 2006...yet his current contract extends through 2011 (assuming the Cards would exercise the option if they can't get another extension signed by then), at an AAV somewhere around $14.5 million. Considering what Jeter, A-Rod and Bonds were making per year in 2004, and Albert's stats to that point, he did not sign for "market value".
Pujols was not a hometown discount in '04. It was a arb years buyout. He specifically said at that point he wanted market value, that there would be "no hometown discount".
There is talk of one for his next (and last) contract.
(Of course, this point is moot since Pujols attended high school and community college in Missouri...thus he was a bad example to use.)
January 14, 2010 at 03:29PM View BBCode
Originally posted by thatrogue
C - LoDuca was a turd...horribly overrated both offensively and defensively. Assuming they get Molina (far from a foregone conclusion, but that appears to be the Mets plan), I'd suggest he is a slight upgrade from their catching situation the past several seasons.
1B - is still a hole, agreed.
2B - In this lineup, the team needs Castillo to be league average.
SS, 3B, LF, & CF have four players who are all above league average, offensively. That is the core.
RF - Francouer is a body but not a solution. Admittedly, this is still a weakness.
SP - Piniero is the Mets targeted player. A decent groundball pitcher that eats innings would slot in as a decent #3 starter and make the pitching staff serviceable.
BP - K-Rod as the closer is a reasonable start.
This is the framework for a contending team. Four above average offensive players, two league average offensive players, a stud #1 starter, a stud closer. With this core, they are better positioned than half of the NL...but, like most teams right now, they still need to finish fleshing out the team.