February 27, 2010 at 04:45AM View BBCode
Originally posted by Tyles
((He did trade Mark Langston for Randy Johnson, and he did draft A-Rod.))
February 27, 2010 at 04:59AM View BBCode
(Yeah, shep, I know he traded away Joe Morgan and Mike Cuellar. I wasn't trying to measure dicks, just sayin' I hate Woody.)February 27, 2010 at 06:58AM View BBCode
Do you guys think Dwight Gooden is a HOFer? I think he is. If not for a cocaine addiction that derailed his career he would have been a first ballot, easy. But his 197 wins are more than Koufax and both pitchers had primes that lasted for similar brief lengths.February 27, 2010 at 07:26AM View BBCode
The Dwight Gooden and Sandy Koufax peaks are not even remotely similar. Koufax isn't quite as great as some would have you believe, given the era in which he pitched and the length of his career. But Koufax's average season is better than every season Gooden pitched except for '85. Plus Koufax didn't pitch for the Mets, amirite Tim?February 27, 2010 at 10:43AM View BBCode
Originally posted by shep1582
mike cuellar for curt blefary
and a lineup of
C Edwards
1B Bob Watson
2b Joe Morgan
3B Doug Rader
SS Menke (with metzger as def replacement)
LF Staub
CF Cedeno
RF Jimmy Wynn
That's pretty close to Bench, May, Helms, Perez, Concepcion, McRae/Carbo/Foster, Tolan, and Rose
February 27, 2010 at 05:13PM View BBCode
I said ALMOST as good, bart. the diff between bench and edwards is negated by morgan helms. watson was better than may. Staub cedeno wynn was every bit as good as platoon/tolan/rose, especially in the 70's before cedeno got hurt. the Reds advantage is ss-3b, and that's where they win out. Rader was a terrific def 3B, as was metzger at SS.February 27, 2010 at 05:15PM View BBCode
Gooden could have had a HOF career, but he didn't.February 27, 2010 at 06:14PM View BBCode
you're right, but isn't that the opposite of the argument you were making for bill doran?February 27, 2010 at 07:19PM View BBCode
Originally posted by dirtdevil
he does have two tigers catchers on the list, both of whom were better than matt nokes.
February 27, 2010 at 07:33PM View BBCode
Originally posted by dirtdevil
you're right, but isn't that the opposite of the argument you were making for bill doran?
February 27, 2010 at 08:22PM View formatted
February 27, 2010 at 08:25PM View BBCode
Originally posted by tworoosters
Originally posted by dirtdevil
he does have two tigers catchers on the list, both of whom were better than matt nokes.
Neither of whom, however, were as good as Simmons, Munson or Elston Howard .
February 27, 2010 at 08:34PM View BBCode
Originally posted by tworoosters
Porter was really, really good but his average sucked at a time when that was very important and he just looked weird .
February 27, 2010 at 08:47PM View BBCode
ok we're not getting too many more pitchers.February 27, 2010 at 08:49PM View BBCode
I don't feel like doing a list, that's a lot of work. I'd rather nitpick everyone else's.February 27, 2010 at 08:52PM View BBCode
well at least throw a few names out we may have missed, ebert.February 27, 2010 at 08:56PM View BBCode
Meh, that's work too. You people are on it well enough.February 27, 2010 at 09:08PM View BBCode
No one has mentioned Rocky Colavito not that I think he could crack the top three in the outfield he's another one of those dime-a-dozen corner outfield guys but he was a solid player plus he has an awesome name. (breath)February 27, 2010 at 09:09PM View BBCode
i haven't seem denny walling, alan ashby, terry puhl or rafael landestoy mentioned yet. that seems like an obvious oversight on someone's part.