October 29, 2007 at 07:25AM View BBCode
Good for him; he deserves better than the shit he put up with in New York. I hope the Yankees lose 100 games next year...October 29, 2007 at 09:15AM View BBCode
And I hope A-Rod gets no offers, as frankly, I do not see him deserving $30 million per year to play baseball, especially not over the next ten years. From 38 - 42, that contract will be a HUGE albatross for some team...so six years at $20 - $25 million per is the maximum that makes any risk/return sense for just about any ballclub.October 29, 2007 at 11:12AM View BBCode
I'd say he come to Atlanta and play 1B. That would fill a big hole amongst other things.:puzzled::lol::P:cool:October 29, 2007 at 01:15PM View BBCode
cubs. he will play shortstop. he will do very, very well, as he is the best hitter around. next?October 29, 2007 at 01:39PM View BBCode
Originally posted by Benne
Good for him; he deserves better than the <b>[Censored]</b> he put up with in New York. I hope the Yankees lose 100 games next year...
October 29, 2007 at 01:47PM View BBCode
No A-Rod needs to stay in American League where he is comfortable and dominant rather than having to learn a lot of new pitchers and go through an adjustment period that most players that change leagues have to(of course he could be exception). I just think it was perfect timing(tongue-in-cheek) the announcement being made to make the most impact on a national stage whether it was decision made by Boras the agent or A-Rod himself it was kind of self-serving but that is most people's opinions of both of them anyway.October 29, 2007 at 01:57PM View BBCode
Clearly the timing of the announcement was self serving and wrong.October 29, 2007 at 02:08PM View BBCode
oh i don't know. you know what the position conversion would consist of? A Rod would take his glove, and go out and play shortstop. he can't make the plays the guy that plays short for the cubs makes now? he would bat third, or wherever he wanted to bat. third base. christ, we have the yankees to thank for that crap.October 29, 2007 at 02:54PM View BBCode
Originally posted by thatrogue
Then again, I remember most of the national media and fans being negatively slanted against A-Rod after he signed the last contract...especially considering that Texas' on field performance did not improve following his arrival.
October 29, 2007 at 02:56PM View BBCode
well he did miss one game in his three seasons there, and his third season his ops dropped to under 1.000October 29, 2007 at 02:58PM View BBCode
In general players who slide down the position chart don't climb back up it after 4 seasons at the new position. I haven't looked but am not certain that you can find me anyone in baseball history (at least since 1900) who has done it. Obviously the chart is as followsOctober 29, 2007 at 03:00PM View BBCode
Except most of the people who move right do so because the don't have the chops to play the more demanding position anymore. ARod moved right because Mr. Team-First-All-The-Time refused to move, despite the fact that he was clearly the less skilled defensive player.October 29, 2007 at 03:06PM View BBCode
The reasoning for the move is not in dispute, I still don't see A-Rod moving back. I think he's 20-30 pounds heavier than he was 4 years ago.October 29, 2007 at 03:11PM View BBCode
He may very well not, but the fact that you're citing this long history of precedent is kind of irrelevant since this situation is different from most others. I can't think of a single other situation where a top player at a key defensive position was forced to move to a lesser position in the prime of his career because he went to another team that already had that position filled.October 29, 2007 at 03:13PM View BBCode
i don't think he will move back, bart, if he goes to a team that already has a shortstop that can hit, and no third baseman. if he goes to a team that has a third baseman that can hit, and a great defender at shortstop who cannot, said great defender is going to hit the road, and will not be missed.October 29, 2007 at 03:55PM View BBCode
I think he moves back.October 29, 2007 at 04:34PM View BBCode
Originally posted by FuriousGiorge
He may very well not, but the fact that you're citing this long history of precedent is kind of irrelevant since this situation is different from most others. I can't think of a single other situation where a top player at a key defensive position was forced to move to a lesser position in the prime of his career because he went to another team that already had that position filled.
October 29, 2007 at 04:35PM View BBCode
Well there you go. I win. At life.October 29, 2007 at 05:46PM View BBCode
Ohhhh, that game is soooo fun. I wonder if warfish has a companion sight?October 29, 2007 at 05:56PM View BBCode
Originally posted by turkob
Originally posted by Benne
Good for him; he deserves better than the <b>[Censored]</b> he put up with in New York. I hope the Yankees lose 100 games next year...
i wish i felt his opting out had to do with sticking it to the yankees, but i think it has to do with money, you think boras would let him leave dollars on the table? that's not in his operating manual
October 29, 2007 at 05:59PM View BBCode
Stoneman leaving + ARod opting out = A big bat signing for the Angels to help out Guerrero?October 29, 2007 at 06:22PM View BBCode
any team that wants to pay $250 million for A-Rod at this stage deserves what they get...October 29, 2007 at 06:27PM View BBCode
you don't think he would be a good fit with the cubs doug?Pages: 1 2